冰巨行星内部深处物理与化学过程研究进展

贺芝宇; 黄秀光; 舒桦; 贾果; 张帆; 方智恒; 傅思祖

doi:10.11858/gywlxb.20230721

冰巨行星内部深处物理与化学过程研究进展

doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.20230721

中国工程物理研究院上海激光等离子体研究所, 上海　201800

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金（12304033）；国家重点实验室开放基础研究课题（SKLLIM2006）

详细信息

作者简介:
贺芝宇（1988－），女，博士，副研究员，主要从事动高压实验研究. E-mail：hezy1213@foxmail.com

中图分类号: O521.2
计量
- 文章访问数: 132
- HTML全文浏览量: 38
- PDF下载量: 111
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2023-08-18
- 修回日期: 2023-09-18
- 网络出版日期: 2023-10-20
- 刊出日期: 2023-11-07

Progress on Physical and Chemical Processes Deep Inside Ice Giants

Shanghai Institute of Laser Plasma, CAEP, Shanghai 201800, China

摘要

摘要: 宇宙中诸如天王星、海王星等冰巨行星的数量繁多，理解冰巨行星的内部结构与局部反应过程对于建立统一的行星演化体系具有重要意义。近几十年来，随着模拟计算方法、实验加载与诊断技术的不断发展，与冰巨行星内部相关的多个物理问题研究取得了突破性进展，如“超离子态水”、“钻石雨”等现象不再不可捉摸。聚焦冰巨行星相关物理问题，简要介绍并讨论了极端状态下的高压状态方程和微观物理过程的理论及实验研究进展，包括相关实验平台与配套技术的发展情况，并对该领域的未来发展方向提出了展望。
- 冰巨行星 /
- 超离子态水 /
- 钻石雨 /
- 动态原位X射线诊断
Abstract: Ice giants such as Uranus and Neptune are numerous in the universe. Understanding the internal structure and local reaction processes of ice giants is of great significance for establishing a unified planetary evolution system. In recent decades, with the continuous development of simulation methods and experimental driving as well as diagnostic techniques, breakthroughs have been made in multiple physical problems related to the interior of ice giants, such as “superionic water” and “diamond rain”, which are no longer unpredictable. Starting from the physical issues related to ice giants, this article briefly introduces and discusses the theoretical and experimental research progress in high-pressure equations of state and microscopic physical processes under extreme conditions, as well as the development of related experimental platforms and supporting technologies. It also proposes prospects for the future direction of this field.
- ice giants /
- superionic water /
- diamond rain /
- dynamic in situ X-ray diagnosis

HTML全文

图 1 天王星内部模型：(a) Nettelmann模型^[6]，(b) Bethkenhagen模型^[7]

Figure 1. Uranus internal model: (a) Nettelmann’s model^[6]; (b) Bethkenhagen’s model^[7]

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 不同混合物的BACF：(a) 不同温度下4种键的BACF，(b) 4000 K下的分子动力学模拟快照，(c) 不同混合物在4000 K、176 GPa下的BACF^[13]

Figure 2. BACF of different mixtures: (a) BACF of four types of bond at different temperatures; (b) a snapshot of the molecular dynamics simulation at 4000 K; (c) BACF of different mixtures at 4000 K and 176 GPa^[13]

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 氧化镁水合物的动力学行为(a)以及理论预言的天王星和海王星的内部结构(b)^[21]

Figure 3. Kinetic behavior of magnesium oxide hydrate (a) and the theoretical prediction of the internal structure of Uranus and Neptune (b)^[21]

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 行星内部碳氢离解演化模型：(a) p-T相图空间^[26]，(b) 行星深度模型^[30]

Figure 4. Evolution model of hydrocarbon dissociation within planets: (a) p-T phase diagram^[26]; (b) planetary depth model^[30]

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 金刚石形成的p-T条件^[33]

Figure 5. p-T condition for diamond formation^[33]

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 (a)激光脉冲诱导液氨样品激波压缩实验装置示意图，(b) VISAR信号和 (c) SOP数据以及提取的速度和温度测量值，(d) 纯液态NH₃样品的拉曼光谱，(e) NH₃沿Hugoniot（黑色方块）的直流电导率^[35]

Figure 6. (a) Schematic experimental setup of the laser pulse inducing shock compression in the liquid ammonia sample; (b) VISAR signal and (c) SOP data together with the extracted velocity and temperature measurements; (d) Raman spectrum of the sample indicative of pure liquid NH₃; (e) calculated DC electrical conductivity of NH₃ along the Hugoniot (black square)^[35]

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 (a) 用于Hugoniot测量的实验装置，(b) PET材料的压力-密度和压力-温度实验数据，(c) 不同EOS的理论模型^[40]

Figure 7. (a) Experimental setup for Hugoniot measurement; (b) pressure-density and pressure-temperature data for PET; (c) different EOS models^[40]

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 超离子态水的实验研究^[8]

Figure 8. Experimental study on superionic water^[8]

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 9 (a) 金刚石离解相变的XRD数据^[11]，(b) 金刚石离解反应的高时间分辨过程^[10]

Figure 9. (a) XRD data of diamond dissociation phase transition^[11]; (b) high time resolution process of diamond dissociation reaction^[10]

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 10 C-H-O混合物在行星内部状态下的金刚石离解相变实验研究^[42]

Figure 10. Experimental study on diamond dissociation phase transition of C-H-O mixture at planetary internal state^[42]

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 11 环氧树脂的金刚石离解反应实验研究^[65]

Figure 11. Experimental study on diamond dissociation reaction of epoxy^[65]

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

参考文献(68)

[1]	BORUCKI W J. Kepler mission: development and overview [J]. Reports on Progress in Physics, 2016, 79(3): 036901. doi: 10.1088/0034-4885/79/3/036901
[2]	ROSS M. The ice layer in Uranus and Neptune: diamonds in the sky? [J]. Nature, 1981, 292(5822): 435–436. doi: 10.1038/292435a0
[3]	NELLIS W J, HOLMES N C, MITCHELL A C, et al. Equation of state and electrical conductivity of “synthetic Uranus”, a mixture of water, ammonia, and isopropanol, at shock pressure up to 200 GPa (2 Mbar) [J]. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 1997, 107(21): 9096–9100.
[4]	STANLEY S, BLOXHAM J. Numerical dynamo models of Uranus’ and Neptune’s magnetic fields [J]. Icarus, 2006, 184(2): 556–572. doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2006.05.005
[5]	REDMER R, MATTSSON T R, NETTELMANN N, et al. The phase diagram of water and the magnetic fields of Uranus and Neptune [J]. Icarus, 2011, 211(1): 798–803. doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2010.08.008
[6]	NETTELMANN N, WANG K, FORTNEY J J, et al. Uranus evolution models with simple thermal boundary layers [J]. Icarus, 2016, 275: 107–116. doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2016.04.008
[7]	BETHKENHAGEN M, MEYER E R, HAMEL S, et al. Planetary ices and the linear mixing approximation [J]. The Astrophysical Journal, 2017, 848(1): 67. doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa8b14
[8]	MILLOT M, COPPARI F, RYGG J R, et al. Nanosecond X-ray diffraction of shock-compressed superionic water ice [J]. Nature, 2019, 569(7755): 251–255. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1114-6
[9]	KRAUS D, RAVASIO A, GAUTHIER M, et al. Nanosecond formation of diamond and lonsdaleite by shock compression of graphite [J]. Nature Communications, 2016, 7(1): 10970. doi: 10.1038/ncomms10970
[10]	KRAUS D, VORBERGER J, PAK A, et al. Formation of diamonds in laser-compressed hydrocarbons at planetary interior conditions [J]. Nature Astronomy, 2017, 1(9): 606–611. doi: 10.1038/s41550-017-0219-9
[11]	KRAUS D, HARTLEY N J, FRYDRYCH S, et al. High-pressure chemistry of hydrocarbons relevant to planetary interiors and inertial confinement fusion [J]. Physics of Plasmas, 2018, 25(5): 056313. doi: 10.1063/1.5017908
[12]	STANLEY S, BLOXHAM J. Convective-region geometry as the cause of Uranus’ and Neptune’s unusual magnetic fields [J]. Nature, 2004, 428(6979): 151–153. doi: 10.1038/nature02376
[13]	CHAU R, HAMEL S, NELLIS W J. Chemical processes in the deep interior of Uranus [J]. Nature Communications, 2011, 2(1): 203. doi: 10.1038/ncomms1198
[14]	CHEN B, ZENG Q Y, YU X X, et al. Three-step formation of diamonds in shock-compressed hydrocarbons: decomposition, species separation, and nucleation [EB/OL]. (2022-08-03)[2023-08-18]. https://arxiv.org/abs/2208.01830v1.
[15]	LIU C, GAO H, WANG Y, et al. Multiple superionic states in helium-water compounds [J]. Nature Physics, 2019, 15(10): 1065–1070. doi: 10.1038/s41567-019-0568-7
[16]	GAO H, LIU C, HERMANN A, et al. Coexistence of plastic and partially diffusive phases in a helium-methane compound [J]. National Science Review, 2020, 7(10): 1540–1547. doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwaa064
[17]	LIU C, GAO H, HERMANN A, et al. Plastic and superionic helium ammonia compounds under high pressure and high temperature [J]. Physical Review X, 2020, 10(2): 021007. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevX.10.021007
[18]	LIU C, SHI J Y, GAO H, et al. Mixed coordination silica at megabar pressure [J]. Physical Review Letters, 2021, 126(3): 035701. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.035701
[19]	GAO H, LIU C, SHI J Y, et al. Superionic silica-water and silica-hydrogen compounds in the deep interiors of Uranus and Neptune [J]. Physical Review Letters, 2022, 128(3): 035702. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.035702
[20]	HUANG T H, LIU C, WANG J J, et al. Metallic aluminum suboxides with ultrahigh electrical conductivity at high pressure [J]. Research, 2022, 2022: 9798758. doi: 10.34133/2022/9798758
[21]	PAN S N, HUANG T H, VAZAN A, et al. Magnesium oxide-water compounds at megabar pressure and implications on planetary interiors [J]. Nature Communications, 2023, 14(1): 1165. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-36802-8
[22]	SHI J M, CUI W W, HAO J, et al. Formation of ammonia-helium compounds at high pressure [J]. Nature Communications, 2020, 11(1): 3164. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-16835-z
[23]	ZHANG P, SHI J M, CUI W W, et al. Formation of NH₃-Xe compound at the extreme condition of planetary interiors [J]. Physical Review B, 2022, 105(21): 214109. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.105.214109
[24]	ZHANG J R, LV J, LI H F, et al. Rare helium-bearing compound FeO₂ He stabilized at deep-earth conditions [J]. Physical Review Letters, 2018, 121(25): 255703. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.255703
[25]	BENEDETTI L R, NGUYEN J H, CALDWELL W A, et al. Dissociation of CH₄ at high pressures and temperatures: diamond formation in giant planet interiors? [J]. Science, 1999, 286(5437): 100–102. doi: 10.1126/science.286.5437.100
[26]	HIRAI H, KONAGAI K, KAWAMURA T, et al. Polymerization and diamond formation from melting methane and their implications in ice layer of giant planets [J]. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 2009, 174(1): 242–246. doi: 10.1016/j.pepi.2008.06.011
[27]	ZERR A, SERGHIOU G, BOEHLER R, et al. Decomposition of alkanes at high pressures and temperatures [J]. High Pressure Research, 2006, 26(1): 23–32. doi: 10.1080/08957950600608931
[28]	ANCILOTTO F, CHIAROTTI G L, SCANDOLO S, et al. Dissociation of methane into hydrocarbons at extreme (planetary) pressure and temperature [J]. Science, 1997, 275(5304): 1288–1290. doi: 10.1126/science.275.5304.1288
[29]	GAO G Y, OGANOV A R, MA Y M, et al. Dissociation of methane under high pressure [J]. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 2010, 133(14): 144508. doi: 10.1063/1.3488102
[30]	LOBANOV S S, CHEN P N, CHEN X J, et al. Carbon precipitation from heavy hydrocarbon fluid in deep planetary interiors [J]. Nature Communications, 2013, 4(1): 2446. doi: 10.1038/ncomms3868
[31]	NETTELMANN N, HELLED R, FORTNEY J J, et al. New indication for a dichotomy in the interior structure of Uranus and Neptune from the application of modified shape and rotation data [J]. Planetary and Space Science, 2013, 77: 143–151. doi: 10.1016/j.pss.2012.06.019
[32]	LEE M S, SCANDOLO S. Mixtures of planetary ices at extreme conditions [J]. Nature Communications, 2011, 2(1): 185. doi: 10.1038/ncomms1184
[33]	KADOBAYASHI H, OHNISHI S, OHFUJI H, et al. Diamond formation from methane hydrate under the internal conditions of giant icy planets [J]. Scientific Reports, 2021, 11(1): 8165. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-87638-5
[34]	NELLIS W J, HAMILTON D C, MITCHELL A C. Electrical conductivities of methane, benzene, and polybutene shock compressed to 60 GPa (600 kbar) [J]. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 2001, 115(2): 1015–1019. doi: 10.1063/1.1379537
[35]	RAVASIO A, BETHKENHAGEN M, HERNANDEZ J A, et al. Metallization of shock-compressed liquid ammonia [J].Physical Review Letters, 2021, 126(2): 025003. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.025003
[36]	CELLIERS P M, BRADLEY D K, COLLINS G W, et al. Line-imaging velocimeter for shock diagnostics at the Omega laser facility [J]. Review of Scientific Instruments, 2004, 75(11): 4916–4929. doi: 10.1063/1.1807008
[37]	MILLER J E, BOEHLY T R, MELCHIOR A, et al. Streaked optical pyrometer system for laser-driven shock-wave experiments on Omega [J]. Review of Scientific Instruments, 2007, 78(3): 034903. doi: 10.1063/1.2712189
[38]	BARRIOS M A, HICKS D G, BOEHLY T R, et al. High-precision measurements of the equation of state of hydrocarbons at 1–10 Mbar using laser-driven shock waves [J]. Physics of Plasmas, 2010, 17(5): 056307. doi: 10.1063/1.3358144
[39]	BARRIOS M A, BOEHLY T R, HICKS D G, et al. Precision equation-of-state measurements on National Ignition Facility ablator materials from 1 to 12 Mbar using laser-driven shock waves [J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 2012, 111(9): 093515. doi: 10.1063/1.4712050
[40]	LÜTGERT J, VORBERGER J, HARTLEY N J, et al. Measuring the structure and equation of state of polyethylene terephthalate at megabar pressures [J]. Scientific Reports, 2021, 11(1): 12883. doi: 10.1038/S41598-021-91769-0
[41]	GORMAN M G, BRIGGS R, MCBRIDE E E, et al. Direct observation of melting in shock-compressed bismuth with femtosecond X-ray diffraction [J]. Physical Review Letters, 2015, 115(9): 095701. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.095701
[42]	HE Z Y, RÖDEL M, LÜTGERT J, et al. Diamond formation kinetics in shock-compressed C-H-O samples recorded by small-angle X-ray scattering and X-ray diffraction [J]. Science Advances, 2022, 8(35): eabo0617. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abo0617
[43]	李俊, 陈小辉, 吴强, 等. 基于原位X射线衍射技术的动态晶格响应测量方法研究 [J]. 物理学报, 2017, 66(10): 136101. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.136101 LI J, CHEN X H, WU Q, et al. Experimental investigation on dynamic lattice response by in-situ Xray diffraction method [J]. Acta Physica Sinica, 2017, 66(10): 136101. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.136101
[44]	KRAUS R G, HEMLEY R J, ALI S J, et al. Measuring the melting curve of iron at super-Earth core conditions [J].Science, 2022, 375(6577): 202–205. doi: 10.1126/science.abm1472
[45]	陈小辉, 谭伯仲, 薛桃, 等. 高压高应变率加载下多晶相变的原位X射线衍射 [J]. 物理学报, 2020, 69(24): 246201. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20200929 CHEN X H, TAN B Z, XUE T, et al. In situ observation of phase transition in polycrystalline under high-pressure high-strain-rate shock compression by X-ray diffraction [J]. Acta Physica Sinica, 2020, 69(24): 246201. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20200929
[46]	DUNAEVA A N, ANTSYSHKIN D V, KUSKOV O L. Phase diagram of H₂O: thermodynamic functions of the phase transitions of high-pressure ices [J]. Solar System Research, 2010, 44(3): 202–222. doi: 10.1134/S0038094610030044
[47]	BARTELS-RAUSCH T, BERGERON V, CARTWRIGHT J H E, et al. Ice structures, patterns, and processes: a view across the icefields [J]. Reviews of Modern Physics, 2012, 84(2): 885–944. doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.84.885
[48]	GONCHAROV A F, STRUZHKIN V V, SOMAYAZULU M S, et al. Compression of ice to 210 gigapascals: infrared evidence for a symmetric hydrogen-bonded phase [J]. Science, 1996, 273(5272): 218–220. doi: 10.1126/science.273.5272.218
[49]	LOUBEYRE P, LETOULLEC R, WOLANIN E, et al. Modulated phases and proton centring in ice observed by X-ray diffraction up to 170 GPa [J]. Nature, 1999, 397(6719): 503–506. doi: 10.1038/17300
[50]	BENOIT M, BERNASCONI M, FOCHER P, et al. New high-pressure phase of ice [J]. Physical Review Letters, 1996, 76(16): 2934–2936. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.76.2934
[51]	CAVAZZONI C, CHIAROTTI G L, SCANDOLO S, et al. Superionic and metallic states of water and ammonia at giant planet conditions [J]. Science, 1999, 283(5398): 44–46. doi: 10.1126/science.283.5398.44
[52]	SUN J M, CLARK B K, TORQUATO S, et al. The phase diagram of high-pressure superionic ice [J]. Nature Communications, 2015, 6(1): 8156. doi: 10.1038/ncomms9156
[53]	FRENCH M, DESJARLAIS M P, REDMER R. Ab initio calculation of thermodynamic potentials and entropies for superionic water [J]. Physical Review E, 2016, 93(2): 022140. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.93.022140
[54]	HERNANDEZ J A, CARACAS R. Superionic-superionic phase transitions in body-centered cubic H₂O ice [J]. Physical Review Letters, 2016, 117(13): 135503. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.135503
[55]	KNUDSON M D, DESJARLAIS M P, LEMKE R W, et al. Probing the interiors of the ice giants: shock compression of water to 700 GPa and 3.8 g/cm³ [J]. Physical Review Letters, 2012, 108(9): 091102. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.091102
[56]	CELLIERS P M, COLLINS G W, HICKS D G, et al. Electronic conduction in shock-compressed water [J]. Physics of Plasmas, 2004, 11(8): L41–L44. doi: 10.1063/1.1758944
[57]	MILLOT M, HAMEL S, RYGG J R, et al. Experimental evidence for superionic water ice using shock compression [J]. Nature Physics, 2018, 14(3): 297–302. doi: 10.1038/s41567-017-0017-4
[58]	GLATTER V O, KRATKY O. Small angle X-ray scattering [M]. London: Academic Press, 1982.
[59]	MCWILLIAMS R S, DALTON D A, MAHMOOD M F, et al. Optical properties of fluid hydrogen at the transition to a conducting state [J]. Physical Review Letters, 2016, 116(25): 255501. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.255501
[60]	WEIR S T, MITCHELL A C, NELLIS W J. Metallization of fluid molecular hydrogen at 140 GPa (1.4 Mbar) [J]. Physical Review Letters, 1996, 76(11): 1860–1863. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.76.1860
[61]	CELLIERS P M, MILLOT M, BRYGOO S, et al. Insulator-metal transition in dense fluid deuterium [J]. Science, 2018, 361(6403): 677–682. doi: 10.1126/science.aat0970
[62]	KNUDSON M D, DESJARLAIS M P, BECKER A, et al. Direct observation of an abrupt insulator-to-metal transition in dense liquid deuterium [J]. Science, 2015, 348(6242): 1455–1460. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa7471
[63]	FORTOV V E, ILKAEV R I, ARININ V A, et al. Phase transition in a strongly nonideal deuterium plasma generated by quasi-isentropical compression at megabar pressures [J]. Physical Review Letters, 2007, 99(18): 185001. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.185001
[64]	MOCHALIN V N, SHENDEROVA O, HO D, et al. The properties and applications of nanodiamonds [J]. Nature Nanotechnology, 2012, 7(1): 11–23. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2011.209
[65]	MARSHALL M C, GORMAN M M, POLSIN D N, et al. Diamond formation in double-shocked epoxy to 150 GPa [J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 2022, 131(8): 085904. doi: 10.1063/5.0082237
[66]	MONSHI A, FOROUGHI M R, MONSHI M R. Modified Scherrer equation to estimate more accurately nano-crystallite size using XRD [J]. World Journal of Nano Science and Engineering, 2012, 2(3): 154–160. doi: 10.4236/wjnse.2012.23020
[67]	WATKINS E B, HUBER R C, CHILDS C M, et al. Diamond and methane formation from the chemical decomposition of polyethylene at high pressures and temperatures [J]. Scientific Reports, 2022, 12(1): 631. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-04206-7
[68]	HARTLEY N J, BROWN S, COWAN T E, et al. Evidence for crystalline structure in dynamically-compressed polyethylene up to 200 GPa [J]. Scientific Reports, 2019, 9(1): 4196. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-40782-5