破片式战斗部破片与冲击波相遇位置研究

陈兴; 周兰伟; 李向东; 胡诤哲; 张瑞

doi:10.11858/gywlxb.20180591

破片式战斗部破片与冲击波相遇位置研究

doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.20180591

南京理工大学机械工程学院, 江苏南京 210094

详细信息

作者简介:
陈兴(1993-), 男, 硕士, 主要从事弹丸终点效应与目标毁伤技术研究. E-mail:1101650359@qq.com

通讯作者:
周兰伟(1988-), 男, 博士, 讲师, 主要从事弹丸终点效应与目标易损性研究. E-mail:lwzhou@njust.edu.cn

中图分类号: O382.1
计量
- 文章访问数: 7914
- HTML全文浏览量: 3314
- PDF下载量: 45
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2018-06-20
- 修回日期: 2018-07-08

Meeting Location of Fragment and Shock Wave from Blast Fragmentation Warhead

Mechanical Engineering Institute, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210094, China

摘要

摘要: 为研究破片式战斗部爆炸后破片和冲击波两种毁伤元的相遇位置，先通过ANSYS/LS-DYNA对破片式战斗部的爆炸过程进行数值计算，再通过试验的方法测量破片和冲击波相遇位置，验证了数值计算方法的合理性。在此基础上，分析了装填系数、破片质量、爆速和爆热对相遇位置的影响。结果表明：随着装填系数、破片质量、爆速和爆热的增加，相遇位置减小；装填系数增加31%，相遇位置距爆炸中心的距离减小11.5%；单枚破片质量增加1倍，相遇位置距爆炸中心的距离减小2.4%。
- 破片式战斗部 /
- 破片 /
- 冲击波 /
- 相遇位置
Abstract: In order to study the meeting location of fragments and shock waves after fragmentation warhead explosions, ANSYS/LS-DYNA was first used to numerically calculate the explosion process of the fragmented warhead, and then the location where fragments meet shock wave was experimentally determined, validating the numerical method.On the basis of above results, the influence of k, m, Q_V and Q_T on the meeting location was analyzed.The results show that the meeting location decreases with the increase of k, m, Q_V and Q_T.More precisely, the k increases by 31%, the distance between the meeting position and the explosion center decreases by 11.5%, the m is doubled, and the distance between the meeting position and the explosion center is reduced by 2.4%.
- fragmentation warhead /
- fragment /
- shock wave /
- meeting location

HTML全文

图 1 战斗部结构示意图

Figure 1. Schematic structure of the warhead

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 战斗部三维计算模型(局部)

Figure 2. Three-dimensional finite element model of the warhead (part)

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 不同时刻破片和冲击波相对位置

Figure 3. Relative locations of fragments and blast wave for different time instants

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 传播距离随时间的变化(数值计算)

Figure 4. Variation of propagation distances with time (Numerical computation)

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 试验装置及布置示意图

Figure 5. Photograph of experimental setup and the arrangement of test devices

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 冲击波超压测试现场布置图

Figure 6. Schematic diagram of experimental setup for blast wave overpressure measurement

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 破片和冲击波运动过程图

Figure 7. Relative locations of fragments and blast wave

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 试验后木块照片

Figure 8. Wood blocks photo after test

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 9 传播距离随时间的变化(试验)

Figure 9. Variation of propagation distances with time (Test)

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 10 不同点处超压-时间曲线

Figure 10. Shock wave overpressure versus time at different locations

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 11 装填系数k对相遇位置的影响

Figure 11. Influence of k on meeting location

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 12 单枚破片质量对相遇位置的影响

Figure 12. Influence of fragment mass on meeting location

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 13 不同炸药类型对相遇位置的影响

Figure 13. Influence of different types of explosives on meeting location

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 壳体和破片的主要材料参数表

Table 1. Material parameters of shell and fragments

Material	ρ/(kg·m^-3)	E/GPa	μ	A/MPa	B/MPa	n	m	c/(m·s^-1)	S₁	γ
Alloy	2797	69.63	0.33	265	426	0.34	1	5280	1.4	2
Steel	7850	210	0.28	335

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 炸药材料参数及状态方程参数

Table 2. Material and equation of state (EOS) parameters for explosive

ρ/(kg·m^-3)	D/(m·s^-1)	A/GPa	B/GPa	R₁	R₂	ω	p_CJ/GPa	V₀
1780	8390	581.4	6.8	4.1	1	0.35	34	1

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 空气材料参数及状态方程参数

Table 3. Material and equation of state (EOS) parameters for air

ρ/(kg·m^-3)	C₀/MPa	C₁	C₂	C₃	C₄	C₅	C₆	V	e₀/MPa
1.25	-0.1	0	0	0	0.4	0.4	0	1	0.25

下载: 导出CSV

表 4 木块距战斗部距离

Table 4. Distance between wood blocks and warhead

Shot	Distance/m
Shot	Wood block 1	Wood block 2	Wood block 3	Wood block 4	Wood block 5
1	0.4	0.6	1.2	1.6	2.0
2	1.6	2.0	2.4	2.8	3.2
3	1.6	2.0	2.8	3.2	3.6

下载: 导出CSV

表 5 冲击波到达时间

Table 5. Arrival time of blast wave

Shot	Time/ms
Shot	Wood block 1	Wood block 2	Wood block 3	Wood block 4	Wood block 5
1			0.752	1.832	2.586
2	1.791	2.334	3.009	3.825	4.771
3		2.876	3.762	4.689

下载: 导出CSV

表 6 冲击波到达平均时间

Table 6. Average arrival time of blast wave

Distance/m	Time/ms
1.2	0.752
1.6	1.812
2.0	2.599
2.4	3.009
2.8	3.794
3.2	4.730

下载: 导出CSV

表 7 计算超压值与试验超压值对比

Table 7. Comparison of the numerical and experimental overpressure results

Distance/m	Over pressure/MPa		Error/%
Distance/m	Test	Numerical	Error/%
2.5	0.356	0.3557	8.43
4.3	0.086	0.0912	6.05
6.2	0.04565	0.0489	7.12
8.0	0.0256	0.0241	5.86
10.0	0.0199	0.0217	9.05

下载: 导出CSV

表 8 战斗部及破片参数(L=260 mm，R=96 mm)

Table 8. Parameters of warhead and fragment (L=260 mm, R=96 mm)

Arrangement	k/%	m/g	t/mm	h/mm	Explosive
	37.31	6.00	9	10	8701
1	40.33	6.00	8	10	8701
	43.73	6.00	7	10	8701
	52.34	2.12	5	4	8701
	52.34	4.24	5	6	8701
2	52.34	6.00	5	8.2	8701
	52.34	8.48	5	9.6	8701
	52.34	12.00	5	12	8701
3		6.00	5	8.2	8701/TNT/B/HMX

下载: 导出CSV

表 9 不同类型炸药的相关参数

Table 9. Parameters of different explosives

Explosive	ρ/(kg·m^-3)	Q_V/(m·s^-1)	Q_T/(J·g^-1)	Explosive mass/kg	TNT equivalent	k/%
TNT	1.58	6856	4225	11.00	1.00	44.51
B	1.71	7680	4690	12.37	1.11	50.05
8701	1.72	7980	5300	11.95	1.25	52.34
HMX	1.89	9100	6188	13.13	1.46	58.30

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(11)

[1]	郑红伟, 陈长海, 侯海量, 等.破片尺寸对空爆冲击波及破片传播过程的影响仿真分析[J].中国舰船研究, 2017, 12(6):73-80. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-3185.2017.06.011 ZHENG H W, CHEN C H, HOU H L, et al.Simulation analysis of effects of single fragment size on air-blast wave andfragment propagation[J]. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2017, 12(6):73-80. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-3185.2017.06.011
[2]	陈长海, 侯海亮, 朱锡, 等.破片式战斗部空中爆炸下冲击波与破片的耦合作用[J].高压物理学报, 2018, 32(1):015104. http://www.gywlxb.cn/CN/abstract/abstract2043.shtml CHEN C H, HOU H L, ZHU X, et al.Coupling action spans for air-blast waves and fragments by fragmentation warheads exploding in air[J]. Chineses Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2018, 32(1):015104. http://www.gywlxb.cn/CN/abstract/abstract2043.shtml
[3]	龚超安, 陈智刚, 印立魁.杀爆战斗部破片与冲击波运动规律研究[J].弹箭与制导学报, 2016, 36(2):33-36. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/djyzdxb201602010 GONG C A, CHEN Z G, YIN L K.Research on motion law of fragment and shock wave of blast fragmentation warhead[J]. Journal of Projectiles, Rockets, Missiles and Guidance, 2016, 36(2):33-36. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/djyzdxb201602010
[4]	LLOYD R M.Conventional warhead systems physics and engineering design[M]. Reston, VA:American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 1998:256-261.
[5]	陈长海, 朱锡, 侯海量.破片式战斗部空中爆炸毁伤载荷研究进展[J].中国造船, 2016, 57(4):197-214. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-4882.2016.04.022 CHEN C H, ZHU X, HOU H L.Research advance in damage load of fragmentized warhead exploded in air[J]. Shipbuilding of China, 2016, 57(4):197-214. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-4882.2016.04.022
[6]	刘刚.破片和冲击波对直升机结构联合作用的数值模拟研究[D].南京: 南京理工大学, 2013. http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10288-1013166483.htm LIU G.Numerical simulation of joint effect of fragments and shockwaves on helicopter structure[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Science and Technology, 2013. http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10288-1013166483.htm
[7]	梁为民, 张晓忠, 梁仕发, 等.结构内爆炸破片与冲击波运动规律试验研究[J].兵工学报, 2009, 30(增刊2):223-227. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Conference/7151735 LIANG W M, ZHANG X Z, LIANG S F, et al.Experimental research on motion law of fragment and shock wave under the condition of internal explosion[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2009, 30(Suppl 2):223-227. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Conference/7151735
[8]	GRISARO H Y, DANCYGIER A N.Characteristics of combined blast and fragments loading[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2018, 116:51-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2018.02.004
[9]	NYSTRÖM U, GYLLTOFT K.Numerical studies of the combined effects of blast and fragment loading[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2009, 36(8):995-1005. doi: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2009.02.008
[10]	刘刚, 李向东, 张媛.破片和冲击波对直升机旋翼联合毁伤仿真研究[J].计算机仿真, 2013, 30(6):68-71. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9348.2013.06.016 LIU G, LI X D, ZHANG Y.Numerical simulation of combined damage of fragments and shock wave on helicopter rotor[J]. Computer Simulation, 2013, 30(6):68-71. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9348.2013.06.016
[11]	凌琦, 何勇, 何源, 等.扇形复合装药驱动破片定向飞散的数值模拟[J].高压物理学报, 2017, 31(5):557-565. http://www.gywlxb.cn/CN/abstract/abstract1995.shtml LING Q, HE YONG, HE YUAN, et al.Numerical simulation of directed scatering of fragments[J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2017, 31(5):557-565. http://www.gywlxb.cn/CN/abstract/abstract1995.shtml