可燃气体混合物燃烧转爆轰判据对比分析

王建 段吉员 赵继波 谭多望

王建, 段吉员, 赵继波, 谭多望. 可燃气体混合物燃烧转爆轰判据对比分析[J]. 高压物理学报, 2013, 27(3): 385-390. doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.2013.03.011
引用本文: 王建, 段吉员, 赵继波, 谭多望. 可燃气体混合物燃烧转爆轰判据对比分析[J]. 高压物理学报, 2013, 27(3): 385-390. doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.2013.03.011
WANG Jian, DUAN Ji-Yuan, ZHAO Ji-Bo, TAN Duo-Wang. Analysis of the Onset of Detonation in the DDT Process for Combustible Mixture[J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2013, 27(3): 385-390. doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.2013.03.011
Citation: WANG Jian, DUAN Ji-Yuan, ZHAO Ji-Bo, TAN Duo-Wang. Analysis of the Onset of Detonation in the DDT Process for Combustible Mixture[J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2013, 27(3): 385-390. doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.2013.03.011

可燃气体混合物燃烧转爆轰判据对比分析

doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.2013.03.011
详细信息
    通讯作者:

    王建 E-mail:wj345jay@sina.com

Analysis of the Onset of Detonation in the DDT Process for Combustible Mixture

  • 摘要: 基于气相爆轰实验中到爆轰时刻不同判据之间的比较,利用数字高速摄影相机,在激波管中开展化学计量比的乙炔-氧气混合气体的燃烧转爆轰实验,对比了6种不同的判据判读到爆轰时刻数据之间的差异。对比分析表明,采用波阵面火焰发光强度和波阵面轨迹作为乙炔-氧气混合气体到爆轰时刻的判据,能够更精确地获得到爆轰时间和到爆轰距离。不同判读数据之间的差异较大,主要原因是在燃烧转爆轰过程中发生局部爆炸,对压力和波速的走时产生较大的影响,导致了判读到爆轰时刻的误差。

     

  • Sun C W, Wei Y Z, Zhou Z K. Applied Detonation Physics [M]. Beijing: National Defence Industry Press, 2000: 6-40. (in Chinese)
    孙承纬, 卫玉章, 周之奎. 应用爆轰物理 [M]. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 2000: 6-40.
    Zhang B P, Zhang Q M, Huang F L. Detonation Physics [M]. Beijing: Ordnance Industry Publishing House, 2001: 51-87. ( in Chinese)
    张宝坪, 张庆明, 黄风雷. 爆轰物理学 [M]. 北京: 兵器工业出版社, 2001: 51-87.
    Brown C J, Thomas G O. Experimental studies of shock-induced ignition and transition to detonation in ethylene and propane mixtures [J]. Combust Flame, 1999, 117(4): 861-870
    Cooper M, Jackson S, Shepherd J E. Effect of deflagration-to-detonation transition on pulse detonation engine impulse, FM00-3 [R]. California: Explosion Dynamics Laboratory Graduate Aeronautical Laboratories, California Institute of Technology, 2000.
    Pinard P F, Higgins A J, Lee J H S. The effects of NO2 addition on deflagration-to-detonation transition [J]. Combust Flame, 2004, 136(1-2): 146-154.
    Card J, Rival D, Ciccarelli G. DDT in fuel-air mixtures at elevated temperatures and pressures [J]. Shock Waves, 2005, 14(3): 167-173.
    Sorin R, Zitoun R. Optimization of the deflagration to detonation transition: Reduction of length and time of transition [J]. Shock Waves, 2006, 15(2): 137-145.
    Wang B L, Habermann M, Lenartz M. Detonation formation in H2-O2/He/Ar mixtures at elevated initial pressures [J]. Shock Waves, 2000, 10(4): 295-300.
    Kuznetsov M, Ciccarelli G, Dorofeev S, et al. DDT in methane-air mixtures [J]. Shock Waves, 2002, 12(3): 215-220.
    Kersten C, Frster H. Investigation of deflagrations and detonations in pipes and flame arresters by high-speed framing [J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2004, 17(1): 43-50.
    Kuznetsov M, Alekseev V, Matsukov I, et al. DDT in a smooth tube filled with a hydrogen-oxygen mixture [J]. Shock Waves, 2005, 14(3): 205-215.
    Aizawa K, Yoshino S, Mogi T. Study of detonation initiation in hydrogen/air flow [J]. Shock Waves, 2008, 18(4): 299- 305.
    Li J, Lai W H, Chung K. Tube diameter effect on deflagration-to-detonation transition of propane-oxygen mixtures [J]. Shock Waves, 2006, 16(2): 109-117.
    Lu F K, Wilso D R. Some perspectives on pulse detonation propulsion systems [C]//Proceedings of the 24th International Symposition on Shock Waves. Beijing, 2004: 75-86.
    Li J, Lai W H, Chung K. Uncertainty analysis of deflagration-to-detonation run-up distance [J]. Shock Waves, 2005, 14(5): 413-420.
  • 加载中
计量
  • 文章访问数:  6875
  • HTML全文浏览量:  552
  • PDF下载量:  332
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2011-04-11
  • 修回日期:  2011-09-15
  • 发布日期:  2013-06-15

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回