Deformation of Rock Material Target under High Velocity Impact
-
摘要: 岩石材料的含孔隙、含水等细观特性对其宏观动力学性能有十分重要的影响,进而影响岩石材料的冲击开坑等动力学行为。采用实验研究和数值仿真分析相结合的方法,围绕含水岩石和干燥岩石的动态力学性能,研究岩石材料的冲击飞溅特性和成坑形态。基于高速破片发射平台,开展岩石材料的冲击开坑实验,分析对比含水岩石和干燥岩石在高速冲击下的开坑效应,以及冲击后成坑形态和喷溅效果。基于实验结果,进行了高速冲击开坑数值模拟研究。研究结果表明:在高速冲击开坑中,含水岩石的坑深小于干燥岩石,其形成的圆锥角度和喷溅速度均大于干燥岩石;岩石的细观特性可以很好地反映宏观力学响应,水的存在弱化了孔隙的作用,对岩石材料的动态力学性能有显著的影响。Abstract: Porosity and water content are typical properties that have a significant influence on the macroscopic dynamic behavior of rock materials, which further on affect the cratering behavior under high velocity impact.This paper was focused on the impact cratering morphology and studied the characteristics of dry and wet rock materials by conducting numerical and the high velocity impact experiments.Based on the hypervelocity fragment acceleration platform, experimental studies on the impact cratering of rock materials were performed using numerical simulation, and comparative analysis of the cratering effect, cratering morphology and characteristics of the dry and wet rocks was presented.The results indicate that, in high-velocity cratering, the target of dry sandstone leads to smaller crater sizes compared with those of the water-saturated target.The transient crater reaches a larger diameter in the water saturated sandstone.The water within the pore space reduces the porosity and counteracts this process, which influences the impact cratering of rock materials.
-
Key words:
- impact dynamics /
- rock materials /
- hypervelocity cratering /
- numerical simulation
-
图 10 Hoerth实验[15] (a、b)和数值仿真(c、d)及干燥(a、c)和含水(b、d)岩石不同情况下的喷溅对比图
Figure 10. Comparison of the evolution of ejection for dry (a), (c) and wet (b), (d) sandstone at different times
表 1 岩石高速冲击开坑实验条件
Table 1. Sandstone sample data and experimental scheme
No. Type Water saturation/(%) m1/(kg) m2/(g) d0/(mm) 1 Wet 45 63.15 2.08 8 2 Dry 62.05 2.09 8 3 Dry 61.70 2.09 8 表 2 高速开坑实验结果
Table 2. Impact cratering test results
No. Type Water saturation/(%) V/(m/s) d/(mm) D/(mm) d/D 1 Wet 45 2 727 25.34 105.60 0.24 2 Dry 2 260 23.72 121.08 0.19 3 Dry 2 652 27.86 112.78 0.25 表 3 数值模拟方案参数
Table 3. Data of numerical simulation
No. Type Porosity/(%) Water saturation/(%) d0/(mm) V/(km/s) 1 Dry 20 12 4.6 2 Wet 20 50 12 4.6 3 Dry 20 8 2.6 4 Wet 20 50 8 2.6 Material Porosity/(%) ρ/(g/cm3) s c/(km/s) γ Steel 7.75 1.49 4.57 2.17 Dry sandstone 20 2.24 1.51 2.06 0.9 Wet sandstone 20 2.40 1.68 2.26 0.9 表 5 成坑参数的数值模拟结果
Table 5. Result of numerical simulation
No. Type Water saturation/(%) d0/(mm) V/(km/s) d*/(mm) d/(mm) D*/(mm) D/(mm) 1 Dry 12 4.6 68.0 77.5 366 324 2 Wet 50 12 4.6 59.6 71.8 338 301 3 Dry 8 2.6 28.8 37.7 123 112 4 Wet 50 8 2.6 25.3 34.5 106 98 -
[1] 游振东, 刘嵘.陨石撞击构造作用的研究现状与前景[J].地质力学学报, 2008, 14(1):22-36. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6616.2008.01.002YOU Z D, LIU R.Research on impact tectonics and impactites:status and prospects[J].Journal of Geomechanics, 2008, 14(1):22-36. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6616.2008.01.002 [2] KENKMANN T, DEUTSCH A, THOMA K, et al.The MEMIN research unit:experimental impact cratering[J].Meteorit Planet Sci, 2013, 48(1):1-2. doi: 10.1111/maps.12035/full [3] KENKMANN T, KOWITZ A, WVNNEMANN K, et al.Experimental impact cratering in sandstone: the effect of pore fluids[C]//11th Hypervelocity Impact Symposium.Freiburg, Germany, 2010. [4] BALDWIN E C, MILNER D J, BURCHELL M J, et al.Laboratory impacts into dry and wet sandstone with and without an overlying water layer:implications for scaling laws and projectile survivability[J].Meteorit Planet Sci, 2007, 42(11):1905-1914. doi: 10.1111/maps.2007.42.issue-11 [5] POELCHAU M H, KENKMANN T, THOMA K, et al.The MEMIN research unit:Scaling impact cratering experiments in porous sandstones[J].Meteorit Planet Sci, 2013, 48(1):8-22. doi: 10.1111/maps.2013.48.issue-1 [6] BUHL E, POELCHAU M H, DRESEN G, et al.Deformation of dry and wet sandstone targets during hypervelocity impact experiments, as revealed from the MEMIN Program[J].Meteorit Planet Sci, 2013, 48(1):71-86. doi: 10.1111/maps.2013.48.issue-1 [7] BUHL E, KOWITZ A, ELBESHAUSEN D, et al.Particle size distribution and strain rate attenuation in hypervelocity impact and shock recovery experiments[J].J Struct Geol, 2013, 56(7):20-33. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191814113001491 [8] SOMMER F, REISER F, DUFRESNE A, et al.Ejection behavior characteristics in experimental cratering in sandstone targets[J].Meteorit Planet Sci, 2013, 48(1):33-49. doi: 10.1111/maps.12017/full [9] GVLDEMEISTER N, WVNNEMANN K, DURR N, et al.Propagation of impact-induced shock waves in porous sandstone using mesoscale modeling[J].Meteorit Planet Sci, 2013, 48(1):115-133. doi: 10.1111/maps.2013.48.issue-1 [10] DURR N, SAUER M, GVLDEMEISTER N, et al.Mesoscale investigation of shock wave effects in dry and water-šaturated sandstone[J].Procedia Engineering, 2013, 58:289-298. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2013.05.033 [11] JOHNSON G R, COOK W H.A constitutive model and data for metals subjected to large strains, high strain rates and high temperatures[C]//Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Ballistics.The Hague, Netherlands: International Ballistics Committee, 1983, 21: 541-547. [12] WANG W, LÜ J, WANG H C.A creep-damage constitutive model for sandstone[J].Appl Mech Mater, 2012, 170-173:289-294. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.170-173 [13] BORG J P, COGAR J R, LLOYD A, et al.Computational simulations of the dynamic compaction of porous media[J].Int J Impact Eng, 2006, 33(1):109-118. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0734743X06001709 [14] WU Y, ZHANG X F, WANG S, et al.Propagation of shock waves in dry and wet sandstone: theoretical analysis and meso-scale modeling[C]//2016 International Forum on Specialized Equipment and Engineering Mechanics.Nanjing, China, 2016. [15] HOERTH T, SCHAEFER F, THOMA K, et al.Hypervelocity impacts on dry and wet sandstone:observations of ejecta dynamics and crater growth[J].Meteorit Planet Sci, 2013, 48(1):23-32. doi: 10.1111/maps.12044/full