Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
YU Jinmin, GUO Xiuxia, HE Zhiyu, SHAO Jianli. Effect of Nanocrystalline Grain Size on the Dynamic Structure and Damage of Iron[J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics. doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.20251288
Citation: YU Jinmin, GUO Xiuxia, HE Zhiyu, SHAO Jianli. Effect of Nanocrystalline Grain Size on the Dynamic Structure and Damage of Iron[J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics. doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.20251288

Effect of Nanocrystalline Grain Size on the Dynamic Structure and Damage of Iron

doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.20251288
  • Received Date: 29 Dec 2025
  • Rev Recd Date: 31 Jan 2026
  • Available Online: 04 Feb 2026
  • Grain size effect is one of the key factors governing the dynamic mechanical response of metallic materials. Phase transformation iron is selected as the model material, and a series of nanocrystalline polycrystals with identical topology and grain orientation distributions but different grain sizes are constructed to investigate size effects under a fixed grain configuration. Molecular dynamics simulations show that, under high strain rate uniaxial compression, all models undergo elastic deformation, αε phase transition, and high-pressure phase plastic deformation. During the elastic stage, grain boundaries act as a soft layer, leading to lower stresses in the fine grain models than in the coarse grain model. After the structural phase transition, grain boundaries hinder the plastic development of the new phase, so that the fine grain models exhibit higher stress than the coarse grain models. At the onset of phase transition, the threshold of phase transition of smaller grains is lower, and the transformed phase in fine grains mainly forms stacking fault structures, whereas twinning structures appear in relatively larger grains. With increasing strain, the disappearance of twinning and the reconstruction of stacking faults are observed in large grains. Under high strain rate tension, shear strain of grain boundary in the large grain models is highly localized, readily forming continuous shear bands that serve as preferred paths of crack propagation. After grain refinement, shear strain of grain boundary gradually evolves into a diffuse mode, and the effective paths of crack propagation are constrained by the network of grain boundaries. The change of grain boundary effects leads to a non-monotonic variation of fracture strength with the grain size.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    周鑫. 塑性变形制备纳米金属材料的稳定性研究 [D]. 合肥: 中国科学技术大学, 2019.

    ZHOU X. Stability of nanograined metals prepared by using plastic deformation [D]. Hefei: University of Science and Technology of China, 2019.
    [2]
    AIFANTIS K E, KONSTANTINIDIS A A. Hall-Petch revisited at the nanoscale [J]. Materials Science and Engineering: B, 2009, 163(3): 139–144. doi: 10.1016/j.mseb.2009.05.010
    [3]
    JEON J B, LEE B J, CHANG Y W. Molecular dynamics simulation study of the effect of grain size on the deformation behavior of nanocrystalline body-centered cubic iron [J]. Scripta Materialia, 2011, 64(6): 494–497. doi: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.11.019
    [4]
    YUAN F P. Atomistic simulation study of tensile deformation in bulk nanocrystalline bcc iron [J]. Science China Physics, Mechanics and Astronomy, 2012, 55(9): 1657–1663. doi: 10.1007/s11433-012-4830-6
    [5]
    DUNGRIYAL P, SINGH S P, PRASAD R. Grain size dependency, plasticity and dynamic property evaluation for nano-crystalline BCC-Fe using molecular dynamic simulations [J]. Procedia Engineering, 2017, 173: 1975–1982. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.02.458
    [6]
    ZHOU X Y, YANG X S, ZHU J H, et al. Atomistic simulation study of the grain-size effect on hydrogen embrittlement of nanograined Fe [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2020, 45(4): 3294–3306. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.11.131
    [7]
    HAN Q F, YI X. High pressure-induced elimination of grain size softening in nanocrystalline metals: grain boundary strengthening overwhelming reduction of intragranular dislocation storage ability [J]. International Journal of Plasticity, 2022, 153: 103261. doi: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2022.103261
    [8]
    BANCROFT D, PETERSON E L, MINSHALL S. Polymorphism of iron at high pressure [J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 1956, 27(3): 291–298. doi: 10.1063/1.1722359
    [9]
    JAMIESON J C, LAWSON A W. X-ray diffraction studies in the 100 kilobar pressure range [J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 1962, 33(3): 776–780. doi: 10.1063/1.1777167
    [10]
    KADAU K, GERMANN T C, LOMDAHL P S, et al. Atomistic simulations of shock-induced transformations and their orientation dependence in bcc Fe single crystals [J]. Physical Review B, 2005, 72(6): 064120. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.72.064120
    [11]
    KALANTAR D H, BELAK J F, COLLINS G W, et al. Direct observation of the α-ε transition in shock-compressed iron via nanosecond X-ray diffraction [J]. Physical Review Letters, 2005, 95(7): 075502. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.075502
    [12]
    YU J M, SHAO J L, SHU H, et al. Deformation and reverse phase transformation mechanism of high-pressure HCP iron during unloading process [J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 2025, 137(4): 045103. doi: 10.1063/5.0238871
    [13]
    DEWAELE A, DENOUAL C, ANZELLINI S, et al. Mechanism of the α-ε phase transformation in iron [J]. Physical Review B, 2015, 91(17): 174105. doi: 10.1103/PHYSREVB.91.174105
    [14]
    PANG W W, ZHANG P, ZHANG G C, et al. Morphology and growth speed of hcp domains during shock-induced phase transition in iron [J]. Scientific Reports, 2014, 4: 3628. doi: 10.1038/srep03628
    [15]
    POGORELKO V V, MAYER A E. Dynamic tensile fracture of iron: molecular dynamics simulations and micromechanical model based on dislocation plasticity [J]. International Journal of Plasticity, 2023, 167: 103678. doi: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2023.103678
    [16]
    GANDHI V, RAVINDRAN S, RAVICHANDRAN G. Dynamic strength of iron at high pressures and strain rates [J]. Physical Review Letters, 2022, 128(1): 015705. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.015705
    [17]
    LUU H T, RAVELO R J, RUDOLPH M, et al. Shock-induced plasticity in nanocrystalline iron: large-scale molecular dynamics simulations [J]. Physical Review B, 2020, 102(2): 020102. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.102.020102
    [18]
    AMADOU N, DE RESSÉGUIER T. Phase transformations and plasticity in single-crystal iron from shock compression to spall fracture [J]. Physical Review B, 2023, 108(17): 174109. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.108.174109
    [19]
    GUAN X R, QU S J, WANG H, et al. Adiabatic shear localization in metallic materials: review [J]. Materials, 2024, 17(21): 5365. doi: 10.3390/ma17215365
    [20]
    JENTZSCH S, STOCK D, HÄCKER R, et al. Shear band formation with split Hopkinson bar experiments [J]. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 2024, 284: 109749. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2024.109749
    [21]
    YAN N, LI Z Z, XU Y B, et al. Shear localization in metallic materials at high strain rates [J]. Progress in Materials Science, 2021, 119: 100755. doi: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2020.100755
    [22]
    SHAO J L, WANG P, ZHANG F G, et al. Hcp/fcc nucleation in bcc iron under different anisotropic compressions at high strain rate: molecular dynamics study [J]. Scientific Reports, 2018, 8(1): 7650. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-25758-1
    [23]
    GAUTIER R, MOMPIOU F, RENK O, et al. Quantifying grain boundary deformation mechanisms in small-grained metals [J]. Nature, 2025, 648(8093): 327–332. doi: 10.1038/s41586-025-09800-7
    [24]
    WU Y C, SHAO J L. Mdapy: a flexible and efficient analysis software for molecular dynamics simulations [J]. Computer Physics Communications, 2023, 290: 108764. doi: 10.1016/j.cpc.2023.108764
    [25]
    GUNKELMANN N, BRINGA E M, TRAMONTINA D R, et al. Shock waves in polycrystalline iron: plasticity and phase transitions [J]. Physical Review B, 2014, 89(14): 140102. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.89.140102
    [26]
    HUNTER A, BEYERLEIN I J. Relationship between monolayer stacking faults and twins in nanocrystals [J]. Acta Materialia, 2015, 88: 207–217. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2014.12.045
    [27]
    ZHU Y T, LIAO X Z, WU X L. Deformation twinning in nanocrystalline materials [J]. Progress in Materials Science, 2012, 57(1): 1–62. doi: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2011.05.001
    [28]
    HUSAIN A, LA P Q, HONGZHENG Y, et al. Molecular dynamics as a means to investigate grain size and strain rate effect on plastic deformation of 316L nanocrystalline stainless-steel [J]. Materials, 2020, 13(14): 3223. doi: 10.3390/ma13143223
    [29]
    MCCORMACK S J, WEN W, PERELOMA E V, et al. On the first direct observation of de-twinning in a twinning-induced plasticity steel [J]. Acta Materialia, 2018, 156: 172–182. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2018.06.029
    [30]
    D’HONDT C, DOQUET V, COUZINIÉ J P. Direct monitoring of twinning/detwinning in a TWIP steel under reversed cyclic loading [J]. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 2021, 814: 141250. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2021.141250
    [31]
    WANG X, WANG J W, HE Y, et al. Unstable twin in body-centered cubic tungsten nanocrystals [J]. Nature Communications, 2020, 11(1): 2497. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-16349-8
    [32]
    CHANG S Y, HUANG Y C, LIN S Y, et al. In situ study of twin boundary stability in nanotwinned copper pillars under different strain rates [J]. Nanomaterials, 2023, 13(1): 190. doi: 10.3390/nano13010190
    [33]
    ZHAO X, LU C, TIEU A K, et al. Deformation mechanisms in nanotwinned copper by molecular dynamics simulation [J]. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 2017, 687: 343–351. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2016.12.061
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(13)  / Tables(1)

    Article Metrics

    Article views(840) PDF downloads(120) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related
    

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return