高压下三元预混燃料层流燃烧和爆炸特性

陈锐 姜根柱 陶钜翔

陈锐, 姜根柱, 陶钜翔. 高压下三元预混燃料层流燃烧和爆炸特性[J]. 高压物理学报, 2026, 40(6): 065202. doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.20251140
引用本文: 陈锐, 姜根柱, 陶钜翔. 高压下三元预混燃料层流燃烧和爆炸特性[J]. 高压物理学报, 2026, 40(6): 065202. doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.20251140
CHEN Rui, JIANG Genzhu, TAO Juxiang. Laminar Combustion and Explosive Characteristics of Ternary Premixed Fuels at High Pressure[J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2026, 40(6): 065202. doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.20251140
Citation: CHEN Rui, JIANG Genzhu, TAO Juxiang. Laminar Combustion and Explosive Characteristics of Ternary Premixed Fuels at High Pressure[J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2026, 40(6): 065202. doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.20251140

高压下三元预混燃料层流燃烧和爆炸特性

doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.20251140
基金项目: 江苏省研究生创新基金(SJCX22_1930);国家自然科学基金(52350410458)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    陈 锐(1999-),男,硕士研究生,主要从事清洁燃料爆炸特性研究. E-mail:231210201105@stu.just.edu.cn

    通讯作者:

    姜根柱(1979-),男,硕士,高级实验师,主要从事绿色替代燃料燃烧特性研究. E-mail:jianggenzhu@just.edu.cn

  • 中图分类号: O389; O521.9; X932

Laminar Combustion and Explosive Characteristics of Ternary Premixed Fuels at High Pressure

  • 摘要: 针对高压下乙醇-氢气-甲烷三元预混燃料的层流燃烧和爆炸特性进行了系统性研究。采用定容燃烧系统,在初始温度为400 K、压力为0.1~0.4 MPa、当量比为0.7~1.4,乙醇体积分数分别为20%、50%和80%的工况下开展一系列实验。结果表明:当量比为1.1时,燃烧不稳定性最强,且不稳定性随着乙醇体积分数和压力的增大而增强,层流燃烧速度随着压力和乙醇体积分数的增大而降低,与机理模拟结果的相对偏差小于7%。在爆炸特性方面,最大爆炸压力与初始压力呈线性关系,其斜率随着乙醇体积分数的增大而增大;最大升压速率在当量比为1.1时达到峰值,最大可达188 MPa/s,对应的爆燃指数为23.66 MPa·m/s,处于相对安全水平。此外,还讨论了不同乙醇体积分数下的最优燃烧区间:乙醇体积分数为20%时,当量比为1.2~1.3、压力为0.1~0.3 MPa;乙醇体积分数为50%时,当量比为1.1~1.2、压力约为0.3 MPa;乙醇体积分数为80%时,当量比为1.0~1.1、压力约为0.1 MPa。动力学分析进一步表明:R1为主导链分支反应,是提升燃烧速率的关键步骤。机理模拟可准确捕捉自由基的演化趋势,验证了反应动力学模型的合理性。研究结果揭示了乙醇体积分数与压力共同作用下三元燃料燃烧和爆炸规律,可为高效清洁燃料设计与燃烧室优化提供参考。

     

  • 图  实验装置

    Figure  1.  Experimental device

    图  定容燃烧弹实物

    Figure  2.  Volumetric incendiary objects

    图  爆炸参数采集

    Figure  3.  Explosive parameter acquisition

    图  层流燃烧速度-当量比(ϕ)曲线对比

    Figure  4.  Comparison of LBV-equivalence ratio (ϕ) curves

    图  火焰形态

    Figure  5.  Flame shape

    图  火焰厚度-当量比曲线

    Figure  6.  Flame thickness-equivalence ratio curves

    图  热膨胀系数-当量比曲线

    Figure  7.  Thermal expansion ratio-equivalence ratio curves

    图  层流燃烧速度

    Figure  8.  Laminar burning velocity

    图  层流燃烧速度-初始压力曲线

    Figure  9.  Laminar burning velocity-initial pressure curves

    图  10  层流燃烧速度-乙醇体积分数曲线

    Figure  10.  LBV-volume fraction of ethanol curves

    图  11  敏感性分析

    Figure  11.  Sensitivity analysis

    图  12  自由基最大摩尔分数的相对增量

    Figure  12.  Relative increase of Emmf of free radicals

    图  13  不同乙醇体积分数下关键自由基生成与消耗的摩尔分数变化

    Figure  13.  Variations in molar fractions of key free radicals generated and consumed at different volume fractions of ethanol

    图  14  初始压力对爆炸压力的影响

    Figure  14.  Effect of initial pressure on explosive pressure

    图  15  斜率和截距与当量比的关系

    Figure  15.  Slope and intercept vs. equivalence ratio

    图  16  预混燃料的(dp/dt)max与初始压力的线性关系

    Figure  16.  Linear correlation between (dp/dt)max of premixed fuel and initial pressure

    图  17  k2i2与当量比的关系

    Figure  17.  Relation between the k2 and i2 and the equivalence ratio

    图  18  预混燃料的tc与初始压力的线性关系

    Figure  18.  Linear correlation between tc of premixed fuel and initial pressure

    图  19  斜率和截距与当量比的关系

    Figure  19.  Relation between the k3 and i3 and the equivalence ratio

    表  1  不同工况下的斜率和截距

    Table  1.   Slope and intercept under different operating conditions

    $ {w}_{{{\mathrm{C}}_{2}}{{\mathrm{H}}_{5}}\text{OH}} $/% Coefficient k1 i1
    a 7.5349 2.9684
    50 b 19.0216 6.8654
    c 5.3950 3.7075
    a 4.0924 0.6587
    80 b 11.9811 2.9577
    c 1.7188 2.5712
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  不同工况下的斜率和截距

    Table  2.   Slope and intercept under different operating conditions

    $ {w}_{{{\mathrm{C}}_{2}}{{\mathrm{H}}_{5}}\text{OH}} $/% Coefficient k2 i2
    a 1750.4196 136.1818
    50 b 4402.8111 415.5362
    c 2377.2581 344.1739
    a 1171.1624 158.8851
    80 b 3171.2492 133.4702
    c 1686.2571 35.2433
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  不同工况下的斜率和截距

    Table  3.   Slope and intercept under different conditions

    $ {w}_{{{\mathrm{C}}_{2}}{{\mathrm{H}}_{5}}\text{OH}} $/% Coefficient k3 i3
    a 0.0121 0.1997
    50 b 0.0362 0.4954
    c 0.0605 0.3079
    a 0.0466 0.0926
    80 b 0.1355 0.2191
    c 0.1373 0.1294
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] 杨涵晞, 周宏春. 我国交通运输业绿色低碳发展现状与促进对策 [J]. 环境保护, 2024, 52(7): 55–59. doi: 10.14026/j.cnki.0253-9705.2024.07.011

    YANG H X, ZHOU H C. The current situation and promotion countermeasures of green and low carbon development in transportation [J]. Environmental Protection, 2024, 52(7): 55–59. doi: 10.14026/j.cnki.0253-9705.2024.07.011
    [2] 马秋菊, 邵俊程, 王众山, 等. 氢气比例和点火能量对CH4-H2混合气体爆炸强度影响的实验研究 [J]. 高压物理学报, 2020, 34(1): 015201. doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.20190803

    MA Q J, SHAO J C, WANG Z S, et al. Experimental study of the hydrogen proportion and ignition energy effects on the CH4-H2 mixture explosion intensity [J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2020, 34(1): 015201. doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.20190803
    [3] 韦仕庆, 刘丰. 氢能源技术的应用与发展研究探析 [J]. 能源技术与管理, 2024, 49(3): 176–179. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9943.2024.03.050

    WEI S Q, LIU F. Research on the application and development of hydrogen energy technology [J]. Energy Technology and Management, 2024, 49(3): 176–179. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9943.2024.03.050
    [4] CHAIMANATSAKUN A, SAWATMONGKHON B, SITTICHOMPOO S, et al. Effects of reformed exhaust gas recirculation (REGR) of ethanol-gasoline fuel blends on the combustion and emissions of gasoline direct injection (GDI) engine [J]. Fuel, 2024, 355: 129506. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2023.129506
    [5] 沈钊丞, 仲兆平, 郑翔, 等. 典型生物质发酵制取燃料乙醇环境影响分析 [J]. 太阳能学报, 2024, 45(4): 280–285. doi: 10.19912/j.0254-0096.tynxb.2022-1886

    SHEN Z C, ZHONG Z P, ZHENG X, et al. Environmental impact analysis of fuel ethanol from typical biomass fermentation [J]. Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica, 2024, 45(4): 280–285. doi: 10.19912/j.0254-0096.tynxb.2022-1886
    [6] KOUPAIE M M, CAIRNS A, VAFAMEHR H, et al. A study of hydrous ethanol combustion in an optical central direct injection spark ignition engine [J]. Applied Energy, 2019, 237: 258–269. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.12.093
    [7] 张家俊, 国丽萍. 氢能管道输送技术最新进展 [J]. 化工进展, 2024, 43(12): 6692–6699. doi: 10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2023-2164

    ZHANG J J, GUO L P. Latest progress in hydrogen pipeline transportation technology [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2024, 43(12): 6692–6699. doi: 10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2023-2164
    [8] GIANNAKOPOULOS G K, GATZOULIS A, FROUZAKIS C E, et al. Consistent definitions of “flame displacement speed” and “Markstein length” for premixed flame propagation [J]. Combustion and Flame, 2015, 162(4): 1249–1264. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2014.10.015
    [9] VASANTHAKUMAR R, LOGANATHAN M, CHOCKALINGAM S, et al. A study on the effect of hydrogen enriched intake air on the characteristics of a diesel engine fueled with ethanol blended diesel [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2023, 48(53): 20507–20524. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.02.113
    [10] AYAD S M M E, BELCHIOR C R P, SODRÉ J R. Exergoeconomic analysis of a lean burn engine operating with ethanol and hydrogen addition [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2024, 61: 387–394. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.02.279
    [11] SHINDE V, FULZELE A, KUMAR S. Experimental measurements of laminar burning velocity of premixed propane-air flames at higher pressure and temperature conditions [J]. Fuel, 2024, 356: 129561. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2023.129561
    [12] OPPONG F, XU C S, LI X L, et al. Laminar flame characteristics of 2-ethylfuran/air mixtures: experimental and kinetic modelling investigations [J]. Fuel, 2022, 307: 121785. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2021.121785
    [13] XIAO H H, LI H Z. Experimental and kinetic modeling study of the laminar burning velocity of NH3/DME/air premixed flames [J]. Combustion and Flame, 2022, 245: 112372. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2022.112372
    [14] YANG H, TIAN J P, CUI Z C, et al. Experimental and numerical study of combustion characteristics of ammonia/ethanol mixture under high temperature and pressure [J]. Fuel, 2024, 367: 131350. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2024.131350
    [15] 苏傲成, 姜根柱, 王筱蓉, 等. 乙醇-氢气-空气混合燃气的层流燃烧速度测定 [J]. 车用发动机, 2024(1): 42–48. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-2222.2024.01.007

    SU A C, JIANG G Z, WANG X R, et al. Measurement of laminar combustion velocity of ethanol-hydrogen-air mixed gas [J]. Vehicle Engine, 2024(1): 42–48. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-2222.2024.01.007
    [16] WANG Q Y, SONG Y, LIU K, et al. Laminar combustion characteristics of methane/methanol/air mixtures: experimental and kinetic investigations [J]. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering, 2023, 41: 102593. doi: 10.1016/j.csite.2022.102593
    [17] 石云姣, 孙继昊, 徐宏昊, 等. 正庚烷/甲烷混合燃烧特性数值分析 [J]. 航空动力学报, 2024, 39(2): 20220152. doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20220152

    SHI Y J, SUN J H, XU H H, et al. Numerical analysis on combustion characteristics of n-heptane co-firing with methane [J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2024, 39(2): 20220152. doi: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20220152
    [18] XIANG L K, JIANG H T, REN F, et al. Numerical study of the physical and chemical effects of hydrogen addition on laminar premixed combustion characteristics of methane and ethane [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2020, 45(39): 20501–20514. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.11.040
    [19] SUN Z Y. Experimental studies on the explosion indices in turbulent stoichiometric H2/CH4/air mixtures [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2019, 44(1): 469–476. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.02.094
    [20] XIAO P, LEE C F, WU H, et al. Effects of hydrogen addition on the laminar methanol-air flame under different initial temperatures [J]. Renewable Energy, 2020, 154: 209–222. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2020.03.037
    [21] LIU Y, GU W, WANG J D, et al. Study on the laminar burning velocity of ethanol/RP-3 aviation kerosene premixed flame [J]. Combustion and Flame, 2022, 238: 111921. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2021.111921
    [22] ZHANG Y, WANG X R, ZHANG J W, et al. Investigation of cellular characteristics of hydrogen-ethanol flame at elevated temperatures and pressures [J]. Fuel, 2023, 341: 127643. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2023.127643
    [23] MATVEEV S S, IDRISOV D V, MATVEEV S G, et al. Laminar burning velocities of surrogate components blended with ethanol [J]. Combustion and Flame, 2019, 209: 389–393. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2019.08.010
    [24] WANG X R, YAN C Z, ZHANG Y, et al. Laminar and kinetic burning characteristics of ethanol/methane/hydrogen fuel: experimental and numerical analysis [J]. Renewable Energy, 2024, 227: 120493. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2024.120493
    [25] MARINOV N M. A detailed chemical kinetic model for high temperature ethanol oxidation [J]. International journal of chemical kinetics, 1999, 31(3): 183–220. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4601(1999)31:3<183::AID-KIN3>3.0.CO;2-X
    [26] METCALFE W K, BURKE S M, AHMED S S, et al. A hierarchical and comparative kinetic modeling study of C1−C2 hydrocarbon and oxygenated fuels [J]. International Journal of Chemical Kinetics, 2013, 45(10): 638–675. doi: 10.1002/kin.20802
    [27] WANG X R, SU A C, ZHU Y, et al. Experimental and chemical kinetic analysis to evaluate CO2 dilution on laminar combustion characteristics of C2H5OH/air blends under normal pressure [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2024, 78: 829–850. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.06.361
  • 加载中
图(19) / 表(3)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  1106
  • HTML全文浏览量:  356
  • PDF下载量:  53
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2025-07-21
  • 修回日期:  2025-09-11
  • 网络出版日期:  2025-09-18
  • 刊出日期:  2026-06-05

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回