岩石爆破损伤演化与动力响应的空孔效应

李涛 倪羽 王志亮

李涛, 倪羽, 王志亮. 岩石爆破损伤演化与动力响应的空孔效应[J]. 高压物理学报. doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.20251116
引用本文: 李涛, 倪羽, 王志亮. 岩石爆破损伤演化与动力响应的空孔效应[J]. 高压物理学报. doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.20251116
LI Tao, NI Yu, WANG Zhiliang. Effect of Empty-Hole on Blasting-Induced Damage Evolution and Dynamic Response of Rock[J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics. doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.20251116
Citation: LI Tao, NI Yu, WANG Zhiliang. Effect of Empty-Hole on Blasting-Induced Damage Evolution and Dynamic Response of Rock[J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics. doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.20251116

岩石爆破损伤演化与动力响应的空孔效应

doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.20251116
基金项目: 国家自然科学基金(12272119,U1965101)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    李 涛(2000-),男,硕士研究生,主要从事岩石动力学研究. E-mail:3443302510@qq.com

    通讯作者:

    王志亮(1969-),男,博士,教授,主要从事岩石动力学与爆破工程研究. E-mail:cvewzL@hfut.edu.cn

  • 中图分类号: TD235; O521.9

Effect of Empty-Hole on Blasting-Induced Damage Evolution and Dynamic Response of Rock

  • 摘要: 针对传统周边爆破易诱发随机裂纹损伤围岩的问题,结合弹性力学理论与基于ANSYS/LS-DYNA的数值模拟方法,对空孔定向爆破中的损伤演化规律与动力响应特性进行了深入分析。首先,基于弹性力学理论,阐释了空孔在爆炸荷载下通过应力波反射产生拉应力集中从而实现对定向裂纹扩展的控制机制;接着,通过建立平面双孔不耦合装药数值模型,系统研究了炮孔间距和地应力场对损伤演化的影响;最后,分析了空孔附近峰值应力和质点峰值振速的动态变化规律。结果表明:空孔能够显著改变爆炸能量分布,将其引导至集中于炮孔连线方向,从而有效抑制非预期裂纹的萌生和扩展;空孔的定向效果受地应力场的调控,高地应力条件会削弱空孔水平方向的拉应力集中程度,进而抑制炮孔间裂纹扩展,故炮孔宜平行于岩体最大主应力方向布置,使定向效果最大化,并减弱地应力的抑制作用;当炮孔间距为11~14倍炮孔直径时,可促进主裂纹的稳定定向扩展,抑制非预期裂纹的发育,显著改善围岩损伤的控制效果。在高地应力工况下,建议将炮孔间距参考值适当缩小至8~11倍炮孔直径。

     

  • 图  相邻炮孔间裂纹贯穿机理

    Figure  1.  Penetration mechanism of cracks between adjacent blastholes

    图  地应力作用下空孔周围的应力分布

    Figure  2.  Stress distribution around an empty hole under in-situ stress

    图  炮孔周围岩石中的静态应力分布(k<1)

    Figure  3.  Distribution of static stress in rock around the blasthole (k<1)

    图  岩石单孔爆破裂纹扩展对比

    Figure  4.  Comparison of crack propagation in rock under single-hole blasting

    图  数值模型概况

    Figure  5.  Overview of the numerical model

    图  空孔作用下的应力云图

    Figure  6.  Contours of blasting-induced stress under the action of empty hole

    图  空孔作用下的爆破损伤云图

    Figure  7.  Contours of blasting-induced damage under the action of empty hole

    图  空孔作用下不同炮孔间距时的爆破损伤云图

    Figure  8.  Contours of blasting-induced damage with different blasthole spacing under the action of empty hole

    图  峰值压力随炮孔间距的变化

    Figure  9.  Variations of peak pressure with blasthole spacing

    图  10  质点峰值振速随炮孔间距的变化

    Figure  10.  Variations of PPV with blasthole spacing

    图  11  不同地应力下爆破损伤云图

    Figure  11.  Contours of blasting-induced damage under different in-situ stress

    图  12  竖直方向的应力时程曲线

    Figure  12.  Stress time-history curves in the vertical direction

    图  13  水平方向的应力时程曲线

    Figure  13.  Stress time-history curves in the horizontal direction

    表  1  RHT模型的材料参数[23]

    Table  1.   Material parameters of the RHT model[23]

    ρ0/(kg·m−3) G/GPa fc/MPa βt B0 B1 T1/GPa T2/GPa pcomp/GPa
    2606 19.8 64.1 0.024 1.6 1.6 19.5 19.5 6.0
    ft* fs* A1/GPa A2/GPa A3/GPa Q0 B ${\dot \varepsilon _{{\text{c}}0}}$/s−1 ${\dot \varepsilon _{{\text{t}}0}}$/s−1
    0.012 0.15 19.5 31.2 17 0.685 1.6 3.0×10–5 3.0×10–6
    pcrush/MPa $g_{\mathrm{c}}^* $ $g_{\mathrm{t}}^* $ D1 D2 βc A N n
    42.7 0.8 0.9 0.036 1 0.019 2.27 0.98 4
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  炸药的材料参数[24]

    Table  2.   Material parameters of the explosive[24]

    ρ0/(kg·m−3) D/(m·s−1) pJ/GPa E0/GPa AJ/GPa BJ/GPa R1 R2 ω
    1180 5122 9.53 3.87 276.2 8.44 5.2 2.1 0.5
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  地应力加载条件

    Table  3.   In-situ stress loading conditions

    λ Case px/MPa py/MPa λ Case px/MPa py/MPa
    0 S1 0 10 1 S7 10 10
    S2 0 15 S8 15 15
    S3 0 20 S9 20 20
    1/2 S4 5 10 2 S10 10 5
    S5 10 20 S11 20 10
    S6 15 30 S12 30 15
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] 单仁亮, 赵岩, 王海龙, 等. 下穿铁路隧道爆破振动衰减规律研究 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2022, 42(8): 085201. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2021-0324

    SHAN R L, ZHAO Y, WANG H L, et al. Attenuation of blasting vibration in a railway tunnel [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2022, 42(8): 085201. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2021-0324
    [2] 蒲传金, 杨鑫, 肖定军, 等. 爆炸载荷下双孔裂纹扩展的数值模拟研究 [J]. 振动与冲击, 2022, 41(15): 300–311. doi: 10.13465/j.cnki.jvs.2022.15.037

    PU C J, YANG X, XIAO D J, et al. Numerical simulation of double-hole crack propagation under explosion load [J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2022, 41(15): 300–311. doi: 10.13465/j.cnki.jvs.2022.15.037
    [3] ISAKOV A L. Directed fracture of rocks by blasting [J]. Soviet Mining, 1983, 19(6): 479–488. doi: 10.1007/BF02497175
    [4] 余绍山, 王薇, 李姚伟奇. 周边眼偏位空孔爆破设计优化研究与应用 [J]. 铁道科学与工程学报, 2024, 21(4): 1509–1520. doi: 10.19713/j.cnki.43-1423/u.T20230931

    YU S S, WANG W, LI Y W Q. Research and application of offset hole for peripheral blasting design and optimization [J]. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2024, 21(4): 1509–1520. doi: 10.19713/j.cnki.43-1423/u.T20230931
    [5] LANGEFORS U, KIHLSTRÖM B. The modern technique of rock blasting [M]. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc., 1978.
    [6] 张召冉, 陈华义, 矫伟刚, 等. 含空孔直眼掏槽空孔效应及爆破参数研究 [J]. 煤炭学报, 2020, 45(Suppl 2): 791–800. doi: 10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2019.1591

    ZHANG Z R, CHEN H Y, JIAO W G, et al. Rock breaking mechanism and blasting parameters of straight-hole cutting with empty-hole [J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2020, 45(Suppl 2): 791–800. doi: 10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2019.1591
    [7] 田国宾. 周边空孔对爆破断裂与损伤控制的机理研究 [D]. 西安: 西安科技大学, 2022.

    TIAN G B. Research on directional fracture and damage control mechanism of empty hole in perimeter blasting [D]. Xi’an: Xi’an University of Science and Technology, 2022.
    [8] MOHANTY B. Explosion generated fractures in rock and rock-like materials [J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 1990, 35(4/5): 889–898. doi: 10.1016/0013-7944(90)90173-E
    [9] 陈秋宇, 李海波, 夏祥, 等. 爆炸荷载下空孔效应的研究与应用 [J]. 煤炭学报, 2016, 41(11): 2749–2755. doi: 10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2016.0462

    CHEN Q Y, LI H B, XIA X, et al. Research and application of empty hole effect under blasting loading [J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2016, 41(11): 2749–2755. doi: 10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2016.0462
    [10] WANG Y B, YANG R S, ZHAO G F. Influence of empty hole on crack running in PMMA plate under dynamic loading [J]. Polymer Testing, 2017, 58: 70–85. doi: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2016.11.020
    [11] 杨仁树, 陈程, 王煦, 等. 不同直径空孔对爆生裂纹扩展行为影响规律的实验研究 [J]. 煤炭学报, 2017, 42(10): 2498–2503. doi: 10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2017.0240

    YANG R S, CHEN C, WANG X, et al. Experimental investigation on the influence of different diameter empty holes on the crack growth behavior of blasting [J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2017, 42(10): 2498–2503. doi: 10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2017.0240
    [12] ZHAI J J, WANG Z L, WANG J G, et al. Numerical study on blast dynamic response of jointed rock mass under high geostress field [J]. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2025, 25(3): 04025005. doi: 10.1061/IJGNAI.GMENG-10125
    [13] WANG Z L, NI Y, WANG J G, et al. Improvement and performance analysis of constitutive model for rock blasting damage simulation [J]. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 2025, 138: 103043. doi: 10.1016/j.simpat.2024.103043
    [14] 汪海波, 宗琦, 赵要才. 立井大直径中空孔直眼掏槽爆炸应力场数值模拟分析与应用 [J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2015, 34(Suppl 1): 3223–3229. doi: 10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2014.0296

    WANG H B, ZONG Q, ZHAO Y C. Numerical analysis and application of large diameter cavity parallel cut blasting stress field in vertical shaft [J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2015, 34(Suppl 1): 3223–3229. doi: 10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2014.0296
    [15] QIN H F, ZHAO Y, WANG H L, et al. Damage prediction and improvement method based on cutting mode of circular empty hole [J]. Scientific Reports, 2024, 14(1): 11322. doi: 10.1038/S41598-024-61599-X
    [16] MENG N K, BAI J B, SHEN W L, et al. Study on the influences of empty hole and in-situ stress on blasting-induced rock damage [J]. Geofluids, 2021: 6643042.
    [17] 陶子豪, 李祥龙, 胡启文, 等. 掏槽爆破成腔空孔效应数值模拟研究与分析 [J]. 兵工学报, 2024, 45(12): 4246–4258. doi: 10.12382/bgxb.2024.0250

    TAO Z H, LI X L, HU Q W, et al. Study and analysis on numerical simulation of empty hole effect induced by cutting blasting [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2024, 45(12): 4246–4258. doi: 10.12382/bgxb.2024.0250
    [18] 李洪伟, 雷战, 江向阳, 等. 不同炮孔间距对岩石爆炸裂纹扩展影响的数值分析 [J]. 高压物理学报, 2019, 33(4): 044103. doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.20180683

    LI H W, LEI Z, JIANG X Y, et al. Numerical analysis of impact of shot hole spacing on crack growth in rock [J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2019, 33(4): 044103. doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.20180683
    [19] NI Y, WANG Z L, LI S Y, et al. Numerical study on the dynamic fragmentation of rock under cyclic blasting and different in-situ stresses [J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2024, 172: 106404. doi: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2024.106404
    [20] 戴俊. 岩石动力学特性与爆破理论 [M]. 北京: 冶金工业出版社, 2013.

    DAI J. Dynamic behaviors and blasting theory of rock [M]. Beijing: Metallurgical Industry Press, 2013.
    [21] FENG C C, WANG Z L, WANG J G, et al. A thermo-mechanical damage constitutive model for deep rock considering brittleness-ductility transition characteristics [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2024, 31(7): 2379–2392. doi: 10.1007/S11771-024-5700-X
    [22] WANG Z L, WANG H C, WANG J G, et al. Finite element analyses of constitutive models performance in the simulation of blast-induced rock cracks [J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2021, 135: 104172. doi: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2021.104172
    [23] 凌天龙. 长城站开挖围岩爆破损伤与累积效应研究 [D]. 北京: 中国矿业大学(北京), 2019.

    LING T L. Study on blasting damage and cumulative effect of surrounding rock in excavation of great wall station [D]. Beijing: China University of Mining & Technology, 2019.
    [24] YI C P, JOHANSSON D, GREBERG J. Effects of in-situ stresses on the fracturing of rock by blasting [J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2018, 104: 321–330. doi: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2017.12.004
    [25] BANADAKI M M D. Stress-wave induced fracture in rock due to explosive action [D]. Toronto: University of Toronto, 2010.
    [26] 岳中文, 田世颖, 陈志远. 炮孔间距对切缝药包爆生裂纹扩展规律的影响 [J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2018, 37(11): 2460–2467. doi: 10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2018.0625

    YUE Z W, TIAN S Y, CHEN Z Y. Influence of the interval between holes on crack propagation in slit charge blasting [J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2018, 37(11): 2460–2467. doi: 10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2018.0625
  • 加载中
图(13) / 表(3)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  276
  • HTML全文浏览量:  100
  • PDF下载量:  9
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2025-06-23
  • 修回日期:  2025-08-21
  • 网络出版日期:  2025-08-30

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回