耦合Level Set方法处理介质界面研究

王星; 马天宝; 郝莉

doi:10.11858/gywlxb.2013.05.011

耦合Level Set方法处理介质界面研究

doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.2013.05.011

王星¹,
马天宝^1, ,,
郝莉²

1.
北京理工大学爆炸科学与技术国家重点实验室，北京 100081；
2.
北京建筑工程学院理学院，北京 100044

详细信息

通讯作者:
马天宝 E-mail: madabal@bit.edu.cn

计量
- 文章访问数: 6918
- HTML全文浏览量: 406
- PDF下载量: 452
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2012-11-01
- 修回日期: 2012-11-23
- 刊出日期: 2013-10-15

Comparison of Coupled Level Set Methods for Interface Treatment

WANG Xing¹,
MA Tian-Bao^{1
, ,},
HAO Li²

1.
State Key Laboratory of Explosion Science and Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China;
2.
Science school, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing 100044, China

摘要

摘要: 研究了耦合Level Set（LS）方法处理介质界面算法，通过对比旋转流场和剪切流场下的界面捕捉情况，给出了各种不同方法在处理介质界面过程中的优缺点，分析了产生这种现象的原因。通过对比分析得到，耦合粒子Level Set（Particle Level Set，PLS）方法以及耦合Level Set和VOF（Coupled Level Set and Volume of Fluid，CLSVOF）方法相比于单纯的LS方法，在流体守恒性质方面有很大的提高，PLS方法可以根据撒播粒子和精确追踪示踪粒子修正LS界面；而CLSVOF方法可以通过重构界面和体积输运，重新初始化LS函数。在实际物理应用中，PLS方法多次重新撒播示踪粒子会降低界面精度，且对每个示踪粒子的追踪需要加大CPU内存，而CLSVOF方法更加高效和合理。
- 耦合粒子Level Set方法 /
- 耦合Level Set和Volume of Fluid方法 /
- 数值对比
Abstract: The coupled Level Set (LS) method algorithm of medium interface treatment was studied. Advantages and disadvantages of different methods in medium interface treatment process were given by comparing different solution of rotating flow and shearing flow, and the reason is analyzed. Particle Level Set (PLS) method and Coupled Level Set and Volume of Fluid (CLSVOF) method are greatly improved in the conservation property of fluid compared on the pure LS through the contrast test. For PLS method, the LS interface can be corrected through reseeding and tracking the particle accurately. For CLSVOF method, the LS function can be reinitialized by reconstructing the interface and transporting the volume. In practical application, the CLSVOF method is more efficient and reasonable, since frequently reseeding will reduce the accuracy and tracking each particle requires more CPU memory for PLS method.
- Particle Level Set (PLS) method /
- Coupled Level Set and Volume of Fluid (CLSVOF) method /
- numerical comparison

HTML全文

参考文献(11)

Unverdi S, Tryggvason G. A front-tracking method for viscous incompressible multi-fluid flows [J] J Comput Phys, 1992, 100(1): 25-37.

Ma T B, Hao L, Ning J G. Interface reconstruction algorithm in Eulerian multi-material hydrodynamic numerical method [J]. Chinese Journal of Computational Physics, 2008, 25(2): 133-138. (in Chinese)

马天宝, 郝莉, 宁建国. Euler多物质流体动力学数值方法中的界面处理算法 [J]. 计算物理, 2008, 25(2): 133-138.

Liu C, Ma T B, Ning J G. Adaptive grid subdivision algorithm based on the youngs' interface reconstruction algorithm [J]. Chinese Journal of Computational Mechanics, 2010, 27(6): 1111-1116. (in Chinese)

刘春, 马天宝, 宁建国. 基于Youngs界面重构技术的自适应网格细分方法 [J]. 计算力学学报, 2010, 27(6): 1111-1116.

Scardovelli R, Zaleski S. Direct numerical simulation of free-surface and interfacial flow [J]. Ann Rev Fluid Mech, 1999, 31: 567-603.

Osher S, Fedkiw R. Level Set Methods and Dynamic Implicit Surfaces [M]. Newyork, USA: Springer Press, 2003.

Sethian J A. Level Set Methods and Fast Marching Methods [M]. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1999.

Enright D, Fedkiw R, Ferziger J, et al. A hybrid particle level set method for improved interface capturing [J]. J Comput Phys, 2002, 183(1): 83-116.

Sussman M, Puckett E G. A coupled level set and volume of fluid method for computing 3D and axisymmetric incompressible two-phase flows [J]. J Comput Phys, 2000, 162(2): 301-337.

van der Pijl S P, Segal A, Vuik C, et al. A mass-conserving Level-Set method for modeling of multi-phase flows [J]. Int J Numer Meth Fluids, 2005, 47: 339-361.

施引文献

资源附件(0)

访问统计