Volume 30 Issue 3
Jul 2016
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
ZHANG Jun-Hui, SHANG Bing. Numerical Study of the Data Processing Methods in SHPB Experiments[J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2016, 30(3): 213-220. doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.2016.03.006
Citation: ZHANG Jun-Hui, SHANG Bing. Numerical Study of the Data Processing Methods in SHPB Experiments[J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2016, 30(3): 213-220. doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.2016.03.006

Numerical Study of the Data Processing Methods in SHPB Experiments

doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.2016.03.006
Funds:

National Natural Science Foundation of China 11572001

More Information
  • Author Bio:

    ZHANG Jun-Hui(1978—), male, Doctor, lecturer, major in solid mechanics.E-mail:jasonstina@gmail.com

  • Corresponding author: SHANG Bing(1979—), male, Doctor, lecturer, major in impact mechanics.E-mail:shang@mail.ustc.edu.cn
  • Received Date: 12 Oct 2015
  • Rev Recd Date: 18 Jan 2016
  • Accurate measurement of the stresses and velocities at the boundaries of a dynamically loaded specimen may be obtained using split Hopkinson pressure bars (SHPB).However, the determination of a representative stress-strain curve based on these measurements can be challenging.According to the principle of SHPB technique, there are three groups of formulae to process the experimental data, and all the formulas are sensitive to time shifting.Due to transient effects and the error of time shifting, the stress-strain curves lack consistency.In order to solve the problem of time shifting, we introduce the three-wave mutual-checking method based on the conservation of momentum and the corresponding data processing program.It is shown that a more reliable stress-strain curve could be obtained using this method.In order to prove the correctness of this curve, numerical simulations of the SHPB experiments were performed.The results show that by using this program, the same result can be obtained by either the three-wave method or the two-wave method, and what matters more is that this method can avoid the error of time shifting which the traditional method cannot.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    TAI Y S.Uniaxial compression tests at various loading rates for reactive powder concrete[J].Theor Appl Fract Mech, 2009.52(1):14-21. doi: 10.1016/j.tafmec.2009.06.001
    [2]
    SONG B, CHEN W N, LUK V.Impact compressive response of dry sand[J].Mech Mater, 2009, 41(6):777-785. doi: 10.1016/j.mechmat.2009.01.003
    [3]
    SHI B, ATTIA M H.Evaluation criteria of the constitutive law formulation for the metal-cutting process[J].J Eng Manufact, 2010, 224(B9):1313-1328. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=6b66a24d0728817b8d988a1843fe5f86
    [4]
    LEE O S, HWANG S W, CHOI H B, et al.Dynamic deformation of aluminum alloys at high temperature by using SHPB techniques[C]//9th International Conference on the Mechanical and Physical Behaviour of Materials under Dynamic Loading.Brussels, Belgium, 2009: 26-32.
    [5]
    LEE O S, LEE J Y, KIM G H, et al.High strain-rate deformation of composite materials using a split Hopkinson bar technique[J].Key Eng Mater, 2000, 183:307-312. http://www.scientific.net/KEM.183-187.307
    [6]
    TRAUTMANN A, SIVIOUR C R, WALLEY S M, et al.Lubrication of polycarbonate at cryogenic temperatures in the split Hopkinson pressure bar[J].Int J Impact Eng, 2005, 31(5):523-544. doi: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2004.02.007
    [7]
    SHAZLY M, PRAKASH V, LERCH B A.High strain-rate behavior of ice under uniaxial compression[J].Int J Solids Struct, 2009, 46(6):1499-1515. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2008.11.020
    [8]
    GRAY G T Ⅲ.Classic split-Hopkinson pressure bar technique.Mechanical testing and evaluation[M].Novelty, OH:ASM, 2000:8-14.
    [9]
    WANG L L, ZHU J, HU S S.An analysis of stress uniformity for concrete-like specimens during SHPB tests[J].Int J Impact Eng, 2009, 36(1):61-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2008.04.007
    [10]
    尚兵, 胡时胜, 姜锡权.金属材料SHPB实验数据处理的三波校核法[J].爆炸与冲击, 2010(4):429-432. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/bzycj201004016

    SHANG B, HU S S, JIANG X Q.A three-wave coupling method for data treatment in SHPB experiments with metal samples[J].Explosion and Shock Waves, 2010, 30(4):429-432. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/bzycj201004016
    [11]
    FREW D J, FORRESTAL M J, CHEN W.Pulse shaping techniques for testing brittle materials with a split Hopkinson pressure bar[J].Exp Mech, 2002, 42(1):93-106. doi: 10.1007/BF02411056
    [12]
    FREW D J, FORRESTAL M J, CHEN W.A split Hopkinson pressure bar technique to determine compressive stress-strain data for rock materials[J].Exp Mech, 2001, 41(1):40-46. doi: 10.1007/BF02323102
    [13]
    LI Q M, MENG H.About the dynamic strength enhancement of concrete-like materials in a split Hopkinson pressure bar test[J].Int J Solids Struct, 2003, 40(2):343-360. doi: 10.1016/S0020-7683(02)00526-7
    [14]
    HUA Z, ZHU W H, WANG G D.The study of numerical character for femtosecond pulse shaping[J].Chinese Physics, 2007, 16(11):3429-3433. doi: 10.1088/1009-1963/16/11/047
    [15]
    CHEN W, SONG B.Split Hopkinson (Kolsky) bar:Desing, testing and applications[M].New York:Springer, 2011:22-36.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(10)

    Article Metrics

    Article views(6661) PDF downloads(158) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return