冲击载荷下Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>陶瓷的失效与破碎特性

孙晓波; 高玉波; 徐鹏

doi:10.11858/gywlxb.20180695

冲击载荷下Al₂O₃陶瓷的失效与破碎特性

doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.20180695

中北大学理学院，山西太原　030051

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金（11702257）

详细信息

作者简介:
孙晓波（1994－），男，硕士研究生，主要从事陶瓷颗粒的抗侵彻机理研究. E-mail：1448938878@qq.com

通讯作者:
徐　鹏（1969－），男，博士，教授，主要从事爆炸与冲击动力学研究. E-mail：xptjl972@163.com

中图分类号: O347.3
计量
- 文章访问数: 7727
- HTML全文浏览量: 3942
- PDF下载量: 46
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2018-12-03
- 修回日期: 2019-01-03
- 发布日期: 2019-07-25

Failure and Fracture Characteristics of Al₂O₃ Ceramics under Impact Loading

College of Science, North University of China, Taiyuan 030051, China

摘要

摘要: 作为典型的脆性材料，陶瓷对变形具有高度敏感性，在强动载荷下具有完全不同于延性金属材料的损伤、破坏行为等力学响应特性。采用分离式霍普金森杆测试系统对Al₂O₃陶瓷进行了冲击加载试验，获得了陶瓷的动态抗拉/压力学性能，以及材料破碎特性随应变率的变化关系。利用能量守恒和动力学的理论方法，对脆性陶瓷材料在不同应变率下的力学特性和碎片尺度进行了深入研究。结果表明：在冲击载荷作用下，Al₂O₃陶瓷的抗拉和抗压强度均与应变率呈正相关。Al₂O₃陶瓷试样在一维应力波作用下的破碎颗粒尺寸差异较大，随着加载应变率的增加，破碎的陶瓷颗粒总数增大，颗粒平均粒径减小，应力集中的影响逐渐减弱。采用DID模型模拟的脆性材料碎片尺度与实验结果比较吻合，Grady模型源于韧性材料的推广，与实验结果的偏差较大。
- Al₂O₃陶瓷 /
- 应变率效应 /
- 破碎尺度 /
- 冲击加载
Abstract: As one of the typical brittle materials, ceramics are highly sensitive to deformation. Under strong dynamic loads, it exhibits mechanical response characteristics completely different from ductile metal materials which involve damage and destructive behavior. In this study, the split Hopkinson bar test system is used to carry out impact loading tests on Al₂O₃ ceramics obtaining the dynamic tensile/compressive properties of the ceramics, as well as the relationship of fracture characteristics with strain rate. In addition, the mechanical properties and fragment size of brittle ceramic materials under different strain rates are further studied by using the theoretical methods of energy conservation and dynamics. The results show that the tensile and compressive strength of Al₂O₃ ceramics is positively correlated with strain rate under impact loading. Furthermore, the particle sizes of Al₂O₃ ceramic samples vary greatly under the action of the one-dimensional stress wave. With the increase of loading strain rate, the total number of broken ceramic particles will increase and the average particle size will decrease, while the influence of stress concentration will gradually weaken. Finally, the fragment size of brittle materials simulated by the DID model is consistent with the experimental results. However, Grady model is derived from the fact that the generalization of ductile materials is quite different from the experimental results.
- Al₂O₃ceramics /
- effects of strain rate /
- broken scale /
- impact loading

HTML全文

图 1 改进的分离式霍普金森压杆

Figure 1. Schematic of modified split Hopkinson pressure bar

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 巴西圆盘试样设计

Figure 2. Design of the Brazilian disc sample

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 动态压缩实验的典型信号

Figure 3. Typical signal of dynamic compression experiments

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 应力-应变曲线

Figure 4. Stress-strain curves

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 动态加载下Al₂O₃的破坏模式((a)和(b)的试样尺寸为$\varnothing$10 mm×8 mm^[12]；(c)和(d)的试样尺寸为$\varnothing$5.5 mm×11.0 mm)

Figure 5. Fractured mode of Al₂O₃ ceramic under dynamic tests ((a) and (b): specimen size $ \varnothing$10 mm×8 mm^[12]; (c) and (d): specimen size $\varnothing$5.5 mm×11.0 mm)

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 Al₂O₃陶瓷不同应变率下动态抗压/拉强度

Figure 6. Dynamic compressive and tensile strength of Al₂O₃ ceramic under different strain rate

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 动态巴西圆盘试样破坏模式

Figure 7. Fractured mode of dynamic Brazilian disc tests

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 动态巴西圆盘实验典型信号

Figure 8. Typical signal of dynamic Brazilian disc tests

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 9 应变率-应变曲线

Figure 9. Strain rate-strain curve

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 10 陶瓷压缩碎片

Figure 10. Ceramic compression fragment

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 11 理论模型与实际碎片尺寸对比

Figure 11. Comparison between theoretical model and actual debris size

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 不同应变率下Al₂O₃陶瓷破碎颗粒尺寸

Table 1. Particle size of fractured Al₂O₃ ceramic under different strain rates

Grain size/${\text{μ}}{\rm m}$	Particle number
Grain size/${\text{μ}}{\rm m}$	238 s^–1	300 s^–1	364 s^–1	417 s^–1	600 s^–1	734 s^–1
<300	571	521	568	689	816	970
300–500	234	236	248	249	265	188
500–1000	38	71	88	74	151	127
1000–1500	69	146	115	99	80	39
>1500	34	28	29	23	22	31
Total particle number	946	1002	1048	1134	1334	1355
Average diameter/mm	344	335	330	323	318	299

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 Al₂O₃陶瓷参数^[20]

Table 2. Parameters of Al₂O₃ ceramic^[20]

$ \rho $/（g·cm^–3）	E/GPa	c/(m·s^–1)	G_c/(N·m^–1)
3.869	290	8658	30

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 抗拉/压强度随应变率的变化

Table 3. Tensile strength varies with strain rates

Tensile		Compression
$\dot \varepsilon$/s^–1	$ {\sigma _{\rm{t}}}$/GPa	$\dot \varepsilon$/s^–1	$ {\sigma _{\rm{c}}}$/GPa	${\dot \varepsilon _0}$/s^–1
178	0.127	238	3.25	8820
212	0.135	300	3.28	8902
248	0.146	364	3.34	9072
307	0.155	417	3.41	9282
340	0.165	600	3.49	9716
392	0.178	734	3.58	9934

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(20)

[1]	WEI G, ZHANG W. Deformation and fracture behavior of steel projectiles impacting AD95 ceramic targets-experimental investigation [J]. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2014, 500(11): 112065. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/500/11/112065
[2]	GILVARRY J J, BERGSTROM B H. Fracture of brittle solids. III. experimental results on the distribution of fragment size in single fracture [J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 1962, 33(11): 3211–3213. doi: 10.1063/1.1931139
[3]	WANG Z, LI P. Dynamic failure and fracture mechanism in alumina ceramics: experimental observations and finite element modelling [J]. Ceramics International, 2015, 41(10): 12763–12772. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.06.110
[4]	SELLAPPAN P, WANG E, SANTOS C J E, et al. Wave propagation through alumina-porous alumina laminates [J]. Journal of the European Ceramic Society, 2015, 35(1): 197–210. doi: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2014.08.013
[5]	DENG H, NEMAT-NASSER S. Dynamic damage evolution in brittle solids [J]. Mechanics of Materials, 1992, 14(2): 83–103. doi: 10.1016/0167-6636(92)90008-2
[6]	ACHARYA S, BYSAKH S, PARAMESWARAN V, et al. Deformation and failure of alumina under high strain rate compressive loading [J]. Ceramics International, 2015, 41(5): 6793–6801. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.01.126
[7]	易洪昇, 徐松林, 单俊芳. 不同加载速度下脆性颗粒的破坏特征 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2017, 37(5): 913–922. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2017)05-0913-10 YI H S, XU S L, SHAN J F. Failure characteristics of brittle particles at different loading speeds [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2017, 37(5): 913–922. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2017)05-0913-10
[8]	GRADY D E, BENSON D A. Fragmentation of metal rings by electromagnetic loading [J]. Experimental Mechanics, 1983, 23(4): 393–400. doi: 10.1007/BF02330054
[9]	周风华, 王永刚. 影响冲击载荷下脆性材料碎片尺度的因素 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2008, 28(4): 298–303. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-1455.2008.04.003 ZHOU F H, WANG Y G. Factors affecting the size of brittle material fragments under impact loading [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2008, 28(4): 298–303. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-1455.2008.04.003
[10]	WANG H, RAMESH K T. Dynamic strength and fragmentation of hot-pressed silicon carbide under uniaxial compression [J]. Acta Materialia, 2004, 52(2): 355–367. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2003.09.036
[11]	段卓平, 关智勇. 冲击载荷下Al₂O₃抗弹陶瓷的力学性能实验研究 [J]. 高压物理学报, 2003, 17(1): 29–34. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5773.2003.01.005 DUAN Z P, GUAN Z Y. Experimental study on mechanical properties of elastics ceramics under impact loading [J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2003, 17(1): 29–34. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5773.2003.01.005
[12]	李英雷, 胡时胜, 李英华. AD95陶瓷材料的动态压缩测试研究 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2004, 24(3): 233–239. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-1455.2004.03.007 LI Y L, HU S S, LI Y H. Dynamic compression test of AD95 Ceramic materials [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2004, 24(3): 233–239. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-1455.2004.03.007
[13]	杨震琦, 庞宝君, 王立闻. JH-2模型及其在Al₂O₃陶瓷低速撞击数值模拟中的应用 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2010, 30(5): 463–471. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2010)05-0463-09 YANG Z Q, PANG B J, WANG L W. JH-2 model and its application in low speed impact simulation of Al₂O₃ ceramics [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2010, 30(5): 463–471. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2010)05-0463-09
[14]	王振, 张超, 王银茂. 飞机风挡无机玻璃在不同应变率下的力学行为 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2018, 38(2): 295–301. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2016-0186 WANG Z, ZHANG C, WANG Y M. Mechanical behavior of aircraft windshield inorganic glass under different strain rates [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2018, 38(2): 295–301. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2016-0186
[15]	罗诗裕, 邵明珠, 罗晓华. 正弦平方势与应变超晶格位错动力学 [J]. 中国科学: 物理学力学天文学, 2010(2): 207–212. LUO S Y, SHAO M Z, LUO X H. Sinusoidal squared potential and strain superlattice dislocation dynamics [J]. Chinese Science: Physics, Mechanics, Astronomy, 2010(2): 207–212.
[16]	GRADY D E, KIPP M E. Mechanisms of dynamic fragmentation: factors governing fragment size [J]. Mechanics of Materials, 1985, 4(3/4): 311–320.
[17]	GLENN L A, CHUDNOVSKY A. Strain-energy effects on dynamic fragmentation [J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 1986, 59(4): 1379–1380. doi: 10.1063/1.336532
[18]	ZHOU F, MOLINARI J F, RAMESH K T. Effects of material properties on the fragmentation of brittle materials [J]. International Journal of Fracture, 2006, 139(2): 169–196. doi: 10.1007/s10704-006-7135-9
[19]	DRUGAN W J. Dynamic fragmentation of brittle materials: analytical mechanics-based models [J]. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 2001, 49(6): 1181–1208. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5096(01)00002-3
[20]	程靳, 赵树山. 断裂力学[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2006: 152–163. CHENG J, ZHAO S S. Mechanics of fracture [M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2006: 152–163.