Influence of the Nose Structure on Penetration into Laminated Target
-
摘要: 对4种不同头部形状杆式侵彻体斜侵彻层合靶过程,进行了数值模拟和试验研究。从开坑过程中质量的侵蚀情况以及靶后动能的角度,对开坑及侵彻能力进行评估。通过研究不同结构侵彻体对靶板斜侵彻的影响,得出了侵彻体动能随时间的变化规律。仿真和实验结果表明,不同头部结构对开坑作用有影响,继而影响后续杆体的侵彻过程。还发现铝风帽穿甲块头部结构对倾斜的层合靶侵彻最为有利,并对该头部的侵彻优势进行了分析, 这将会对其它类似侵彻体头部结构优化提供一定的参考。Abstract: The experimental and simulation studies were carried out for the 4 different nose structures of rod penetrator oblique penetrating into three-layer laminated target.For the different types of nose structures, the ability of their penetration was assessed by crater formed in the erosion of quality as well as the kinetic energy behind target.Through the description of the penetration, the changing rules of kinetic energy with time were obtained for different nose structural penetrators respectively.The experimental and simulation results indicate that the nose structures are influential for crater forming, and then the process of crater formation will directly affect the subsequent process of penetration.From the investigation, it is found out that the aluminum ogive armor-piercing block nose of structure is the most favorable in the three-layer laminated targets of penetration, and we also have analysised the penetration advantage of this nose structure, which will serve as a reference to optimize the structure of other similar penetrators.
-
Key words:
- nose structure /
- laminated target /
- numerical simulation /
- experiment /
- crater formation /
- armor-piercing block
-
表 1 弹芯结构基本质量
Table 1. Basic quality of penetrators' structure
Label Structure name Nose of mass/(g) Total mass of penetrator/(g) (a) Nose of sectional cone shaped 4.6 52.0 (b) Overall tungsten prong 4.4 51.8 (c) Nose of aluminum ogive and piercing block 4.2 51.6 (d) Overall tungsten flat nose 4.3 51.7 Material ρ/(g/cm3) E/(GPa) μ A/(MPa) B/(MPa) C n m Tmelt/(K) Troom/(K) 93W 17.60 350 0.28 1 506 177 0.008 0.12 1.0 1 450 294 L4 2.77 69 0.33 426 265 0.015 0.34 1.0 775 294 RHA603 7.85 210 0.22 792 180 0.016 0.12 1.0 1 520 294 表 3 试验及仿真结果
Table 3. The result of experiment and simulation
No. Type Penetrator mass/(g) v/(m/s) Penetration effect Experiment/(m/s) Simulation/(m/s) 1 (a) 51.4 1 395 Ⅲ target not penetrated vs0≥1 650 vs0≈1 690 2 (a) 51.5 1 458 Ⅲ target not penetrated 3 (a) 51.6 1 629 Ⅲ target not penetrated 4 (a) 51.7 1 637 Ⅲ target not penetrated 5 (a) 51.2 1 650 Ⅲ target high-back convex 6 (b) 51.6 1 467 Ⅲ target not penetrated vs0≈1 593 vs0≈1 590 7 (b) 51.4 1 574 Ⅲ target not penetrated 8 (b) 51.8 1 593 Ⅲ target drift plug penetrated 9 (c) 51.2 1 375 Ⅲ target not penetrated vs0≈1 478 vs0≈1 460 10 (c) 51.5 1 430 Ⅲ target not penetrated 11 (c) 51.9 1 455 Ⅲ target not penetrated 12 (c) 51.4 1 478 Ⅲ target penetrated 13 (d) 51.8 1 485 Ⅲ target not penetrated vs0≈1 582 vs0≈1 580 14 (d) 51.7 1 532 Ⅲ target dorsal fissure 15 (d) 51.9 1 582 Ⅲ target drift plug penetrated -
[1] Luk V K, Forrestal M J. Penetration into semi-infinite reinforced-concrete targets with spherical and ogival nose projectiles[J]. Int J Impact Eng, 1987, 16(4): 291-301. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0734743X87900960 [2] Rosenberg Z, Dekel E. On the role of nose profile in long-rod penetration[J]. Int J Impact Eng, 1999, 22(5): 551-557. doi: 10.1016/S0734-743X(98)00054-2 [3] 程兴旺, 王富耻, 李树奎, 等.不同头部形状长杆弹侵彻过程的数值模拟[J].兵工学报, 2007, 28(8): 930-933. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-BIGO200708008.htmCheng X W, Wang F C, Li S K, et al. Simulation on the penetrations of long-rod projectiles[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2007, 28(8): 930-933. (in Chinese) http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-BIGO200708008.htm [4] 温万治, 恽寿榕, 江松.弹头部形状对侵彻影响的数值模拟研究[J].爆炸与冲击, 2003, 23(2): 140-146. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-BZCJ200302008.htmWen W Z, Yun S R, Jiang S. Numerical simulation for ogival and flat nose projectiles penetrating into semi-infinite concrete targets[J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2003, 23(2): 140-146. (in Chinese) http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-BZCJ200302008.htm [5] Yarin A L, Rubin M B, Roisman I V. Penetration of a rigid projectile into an elastic-plastic target of finite thickness[J]. Int J Impact Eng, 1995, 16(5): 80l-831. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0734743X95000197 [6] Yossifon G, Rubin M B, Yarin A L. Penetration of a rigid projectile into a finite thickness elastic-plastic target comparison between theory and numerical computations[J]. Int J Impact Eng, 2001, 25(3): 265-290. doi: 10.1016/S0734-743X(00)00040-3 [7] 赵国志, 王晓鸣, 潘正伟.杆式穿甲弹设计理论[M].北京: 兵器工业出版社, 1997: 15-19.Zhao G Z, Wang X M, Pan Z W. Long Rod Penetrator of Design Theory[M]. Beijing: Armament Industry Press, 1997: 15-19. (in Chinese) [8] 赵国志.穿甲工程力学[M].北京: 兵器工业出版社, 1992: 147-149.Zhao G Z. Armour-Piercing Engineering Mechanics[M]. Beijing: Armament Industry Press, 1992: 147-149. (in Chinese) [9] Liang C C, Yang M F, Wu P W. Resistant performance of perforation of multi-layered targets using an estimation procedure with marine application[J]. Ocean Eng, 2005, 32(3): 441-468. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002980180400191X [10] 韩永要.杆-管异形侵彻体侵彻机理研究[D].南京: 南京理工大学, 2005: 19-26.Han Y Y. Research on penetration mechanism of novel penetrator composed by rod and tube[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Science and Technology, 2005: 19-26. (in Chinese) [11] Goldsmith W. Review non-ideal projectile impact on targets[J]. Int J Impact Eng, 1999, 22(2/3): 95-395. [12] 王礼立.应立波基础[M].北京: 国防工业出版社, 1984: 43-45.Wang L L. The Basis of the Stress Wave[M]. Beijing: National Defense Industry Press, 1984: 43-45. (in Chinese)