Optimization Design of Precursor K-Charge Structure of Tandem Warhead
-
摘要: 针对串联战斗部前级装药大开孔兼顾侵深的要求,应用LS-DYNA有限元软件,结合正交优化设计方法,仿真研究了K装药的药型罩及隔板结构参数对高速聚能杆式射流成型的影响规律,找出了形成较高头部速度的聚能杆式射流的药型罩外壁曲率半径和偏心距(分别为90~110 mm和35~40 mm)。计算得到了各结构参数(偏心距、罩外壁曲率半径、壁厚、隔板直径、张角、锥角)对聚能杆式侵彻体成型指标(头部速度和头尾速度差)影响的主次顺序,获得了K装药结构参数的最佳组合。进行了X光成像及侵彻钢靶实验,侵深达到装药口径的3.73倍,侵彻孔径为装药口径的0.36倍,侵彻孔径较均匀。数值模拟结果与实验结果吻合较好,研究结果为串联聚能装药技术的进一步研究提供了参考依据。Abstract: Aimed at the requirement of large hole diameter and deep penetration depth of tandem warhead precursor charge, by using LS-DYNA finite element software and orthogonal optimal design method, the influence law of the liner and foam structural parameters of K-charge on the formation of the shaped jet was studied.The relatively high tip velocity was gained, when the liner curvature radius was selected within a range between 90 and 110 mm, and the eccentricity was taken between 35 and 40 mm.The influence sequence of the structural parameters, including eccentricity, curvature radius, thickness, foam diameter, opening angle, and cone angle, on the jet formation indexes (tip velocity, tip and tail velocity difference) was obtained, and the optimal combination of K-charge structural parameters was acquired.The X-ray imaging and steel penetration experiments were also carried out.The experimental results show that the penetration depth and hole diameter reach 3.73 and 0.36 times of charge diameter, respectively, and the penetration hole is relatively homogenous.The simulation results are in good agreement with the experimental results, which provides a reference for the further study of tandem shaped charge technique.
-
Key words:
- K-charge /
- tandem warhead /
- shaped charge jet /
- orthogonal optimize /
- numerical simulation
-
表 1 正交试验的各因素水平表
Table 1. Factor levels in orthogonal test
Factor level Factor a/(mm) r1/(mm) h/(mm) Dg/Dk α/(°) β/(°) 1 35 90 2.2 0.70 3 50 2 36 95 2.4 0.75 4 55 3 37 100 2.6 0.80 5 60 4 38 105 2.8 0.85 6 65 5 39 110 3.0 0.90 7 70 表 2 L25正交阵列各方案的计算结果
Table 2. Results of simulation scheme using L25 orthogonal array
Project La Lr1 Lh LDg Lα Lβ vtip/(m/s) vtail/(m/s) Δv /(m/s) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 893 1 445 4 448 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 5 550 1 605 3 945 3 1 3 3 3 3 3 5 480 1 779 3 701 4 1 4 4 4 4 4 5 415 1 943 3 472 5 1 5 5 5 5 5 5 432 2 039 3 393 6 2 1 2 3 4 5 5 906 1 380 4 526 7 2 2 3 4 5 1 5 746 1 549 4 197 8 2 3 4 5 1 2 5 482 1 711 3 771 9 2 4 5 1 2 3 4 909 1 732 3 177 10 2 5 1 2 3 4 5 723 2 214 3 509 11 3 1 3 5 2 4 5 672 1 226 4 446 12 3 2 4 1 3 5 5 319 1 414 3 905 13 3 3 5 2 4 1 5 205 1 562 3 643 14 3 4 1 3 5 2 5 842 2 062 3 780 15 3 5 2 4 1 3 5 641 2 118 3 523 16 4 1 4 2 5 3 5 734 1 298 4 436 17 4 2 5 3 1 4 5 375 1 406 3 969 18 4 3 1 4 2 5 6 121 2 410 3 711 19 4 4 2 5 3 1 5 739 1 988 3 751 20 4 5 3 1 4 2 5 287 1 996 3 291 21 5 1 5 4 3 2 5 921 1 335 4 586 22 5 2 1 5 4 3 6 255 1 529 4 726 23 5 3 2 1 5 4 5 608 1 606 4 002 24 5 4 3 2 1 5 5 295 1 749 3 546 25 5 5 4 3 2 1 5 346 1 894 3 452 表 3 各个指标的极差
Table 3. Extreme differences of different indexes
Factor Svtip/(m/s) SΔv/(m/s) a 149.2 270.6 r1 385.2 1 054.8 h 598.4 281.2 Dg 365.6 252.8 α 152.8 215.4 β 57.8 96.4 表 4 正交优化后K装药结构仿真与实验结果的对比(60 μs)
Table 4. Comparison of simulated and experimental results for K-charge based on the orthogonal design (60 μs)
Process Method Picture vtip/(m/s) vtail/(m/s) P/(mm) Dh/(mm) Formation Sim. 5 846 1 764 Exp. 5 628 1 520 Penetration Sim. 428 36 Exp. 410 40 -
[1] 周天胜.串联聚能装药战斗部技术综述[J].弹箭与制导学报, 1997, 6(1): 61-65. http://www.cqvip.com/Main/Detail.aspx?id=1766825Zhou T S. Summarization of tandem shaped charge warhead[J]. Journal of Projectiles, Rockets, Missiles and Guidance, 1997, 6(1): 61-65. (in Chinese) http://www.cqvip.com/Main/Detail.aspx?id=1766825 [2] Kintish I L, Marcus I. Projectile with differential tandem shaped charges: USA, US3750582 A[P]. 1973-08-07. [3] 张先锋, 陈惠武, 何勇, 等.反钢筋混凝土串联聚能装药技术研究[J].爆炸与冲击, 2008, 28(3): 207-212. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-BZCJ200803003.htmZhang X F, Chen H W, He Y, et al. Study on a tandem shaped charge technique to reinforce concrete[J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2008, 28(3): 207-212. (in Chinese) http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-BZCJ200803003.htm [4] Funston R J, Mattsson K V, Ouye N N. K-charge-A multipurpose shaped charge warhead: USA, US6393991 B1[P]. 2002-05-28. [5] 谭多望, 孙承纬.成型装药研究新进展[J].爆炸与冲击, 2008, 28(1): 50-56. http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/bzycj200801009Tan D W, Sun C W. Progress in studies on shaped charge[J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2008, 28(1): 50-56. (in Chinese) http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/bzycj200801009 [6] Li W B, Wang X M, Li W B, et al. The effect of annular multi-point initiation on the formation and penetration of an explosively formed penetrator[J]. Int J Impact Eng, 2010, 37(4): 414-424. doi: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2009.08.008 [7] 张先锋, 陈惠武.三种典型聚能射流侵彻靶板数值模拟[J].系统仿真学报, 2007, 19(19): 4399-4410. http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/xtfzxb200719012Zhang X F, Chen H W. Computional study of three typical shaped charge jets[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2007, 19(19): 4399-4410. (in Chinese) http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/xtfzxb200719012 [8] Livermore. LS-DYNA Keyword User's Manual[M]. California, USA: Livermore Software Technology Corporation, 2003. [9] 袁志发, 周静芋.试验设计与分析[M].北京: 高等教育出版社, 2000.Yuan Z F, Zhou J Y. Design and Analysis of Experiments[M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2000. (in Chinese)