Hopkinson压杆测试材料动态断裂韧性的数值模拟

潘建华; 陈学东

doi:10.11858/gywlxb.2013.06.010

Hopkinson压杆测试材料动态断裂韧性的数值模拟

doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.2013.06.010

潘建华^1,2,
陈学东^1,2, ,

1.
合肥通用机械研究院国家压力容器与管道安全工程技术研究中心，安徽合肥 230031；
2.
中国科学技术大学材料力学行为和设计国家重点实验室，安徽合肥 230027

详细信息

通讯作者:
陈学东 E-mail:chenxuedong@hgmri.com

计量
- 文章访问数: 6544
- HTML全文浏览量: 315
- PDF下载量: 460
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2011-12-20
- 修回日期: 2012-03-30
- 发布日期: 2013-12-15

Numerical Simulation of Dynamic Fracture Toughness Test Using Three-Point Bending Specimen in SHPB

PAN Jian-Hua^1,2,
CHEN Xue-Dong^{1,2
, ,}

1.
National Technology Research Center on Pressure Vessel and Pipeline Safety Engineering, Hefei general Machinery Research Institute, Hefei 230031, China;
2.
CAS Key Laboratory for Mechanical Behaviour and Design of Materials, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230027, China

摘要

摘要: 用ABAQUS有限元软件并结合3D断裂力学软件ZENCRACK，建立了三维有限元模型，对霍普金森压杆测试材料的动态断裂韧性进行了数值模拟，同时建立了二维平面应变有限元模型。有限元模型包括整个实验装置（子弹、入射杆、试样和支座），并对3种不同初始裂纹长度的三点弯曲试样在同一速度子弹打击下进行了计算。起裂时间通过RKR局部应力断裂准则获得，结合计算得到的动态应力强度因子冲击响应曲线，最终得到材料的动态断裂韧性。以实验结果为基准，对比三维和二维有限元计算结果，发现三维有限元的计算结果优于二维计算结果。
- 动态断裂韧性 /
- RKR局部应力断裂准则 /
- 数值模拟
Abstract: This paper examines 3D and 2D numerical simulations of dynamic fracture toughness test using TPB specimen in SHPB by using commercial code ABAQUS 6.8 and 3D fracture mechanics code ZENCRACK 7.7. The finite element model includes the whole experimental device (the projectile, the input bar, the specimen and the supporting device). Three cases of specimens with different initial crack length impacted by projectiles were simulated, and dynamic stress intensity factor impulse response curves were obtained. The dynamic initial fracture times, tf, were extracted from RKR local stress fracture criterion. The material dynamic fracture toughness are successfully obtained from numerical simulations. The simulated results from 2D and 3D FEM are compared with benchmark tests, finding that 3D finite element results are better than 2D results.
- dynamic fracture toughness /
- RKR local stress fracture criterion /
- numerical simulation

HTML全文

参考文献(21)

Ruiz C, Mines R. The Hopkinson pressure bar: An alternative to the instrumented pendulum for Charpy test [J]. Int J Fract, 1985, 29(2): 101-109.

Bacon C, Farm J, Lataillade J. Dynamic fracture toughness determined from load-point displacement [J]. Exp Mech, 1994, 20(1): 217-223.

Yokoyama T. Determination of dynamic fracture-initiation toughness using a novel impact bend test procedure [J]. Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology, 1993, 115(2): 389-397.

Li Y L, Liu Y Y. Calculation of DSIF of three point bending specimen using the method of DCOD [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 1993, 13(3): 249-256. (in Chinese)

李玉龙, 刘元镛. 用裂纹张开位移计算三点弯曲试样的动态应力强度因子 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 1993, 13(3): 249-256.

Liu R T, Zhang X X, Jiang F C, et al. Analysis of dynamic response of stress intensity factor of three-point bending specimen by using finite element method [J]. Journal of Harbin Engineering University, 2000, 21(3): 49-51. (in Chinese)

刘瑞堂, 张晓欣, 姜风春, 等. 三点弯曲试样应力强度因子动态响应的有限元分析 [J]. 哈尔滨工程大学学报, 2000, 21(3): 49-51.

Crouch B A. Finite element modeling of the three-point bend impact test [J]. Comput Struct, 1993, 48(1): 167-173.

Rubio L, Fernandez-Sez J, Navarro C. Determination of dynamic fracture-initiation toughness using three-point bending tests in a modified Hopkinson pressure bar [J]. Exp Mechan, 2003, 4(3): 379-386.

Loya J A, Fernandez-Sez J. Three-dimensional effects on the dynamic fracture determination of Al 7075-T651 using TPB specimens [J]. Int J Solids Struct, 2008, 45(7/8): 2203-2219.

Narashiman R, Rosakis A. Three-dimensional effects near a crack tip in a ductile three point bend specimen, Part Ⅰ: numerical investigations [J]. J Appl Mechan, 1990, 5(2): 121-134.

Rokach I V. Estimation of the three-dimensional effects for the impact fracture specimen [J]. Arch Mech Eng, 1996, 43(2/3): 241-52.

Zentech Inernational Ltd. ZENCRACK User's Manual Version 7. 7 [Z]. London: Zentech Inernational Ltd, 2011.

Wall O. Numerical modeling of fracture initiation in large steel specimens at impact [J]. Eng Fract Mech, 2002, 6(9): 851-863.

Dassault Systemes Simulia Corp. ABAQUS User's Manual Version 6. 8 [Z]. Rhode Island: Hibbitt, Karlsson Sorensen Inc, 2007.

Kuntiyawichai K, Burdekin F M. Engineering assessment of cracked structures subjected to dynamic loads using fracture mechanics assessment [J]. Eng Fract Mech, 2003, 7(3): 1991-2014.

American Society for Testing and Materials. ASTM E1820 standard test method for measurement of fracture toughness, Annual book of ASTM standards [S]. West Conshohocken: ASTM, 2005.

Loya J A, Fernandez-Saez J. Effect of the thickness, initial crack length and impact velocity on fracture dynamic initiation toughness of aluminum alloy [J]. Journal of Testing and Evaluation, 2007, 35(1): 25-30.

Li Z A. Pressure vessel fracture mechanics and defect assessment [M]. Dalian: Dalian University of Technology Press, 1994: 73-76. (in Chinese)

李志安. 压力容器断裂理论与缺陷评定 [M]. 大连: 大连理工大学出版社, 1994: 73-76.

Ritchie R O, Knott J F, Rice J R. On the relationship between critical tensile stress and fracture toughness in mild steel [J]. J Mech Phys Solids, 1973, 2(1): 395-410.

施引文献

资源附件(0)

访问统计