-
摘要: 在重建Cochran-Banner模型的基础上提出了一种新的概念性层裂模型。这种新模型仅保留Cochran-Banner模型中的强度函数,重新定义损伤,并抛弃了基本假设:一旦微损伤形成,使微损伤演化远远易于使固体进一步体积应变,进而修正了差分微元中固体比容的计算。在新的模型中,一旦拉伸应力达到层裂强度,重新定义的损伤将由强度函数确定的应力松弛方程、计及损伤的能量守恒方程、状态方程以及本构方程等一系列封闭方程组确定。新模型中也仅包含两个参数:层裂强度及临界损伤度,它们的确定能使在一定初、边值条件下的层裂试验的数值计算结果与实验测得的靶自由面速度历史或靶-低阻抗界面应力历史以及回收观测的层裂面上的损伤一致。强调指出,选定强度函数或应力松弛方程提供了确定损伤的可能,同时排除了任何外加的损伤演化方程。Abstract: A new conceptual model to describe spallation was presented basing on the original Cochran-Banner spall model. The strength function given by Cochran-Banner was maintained using the redefined damage, and the correction concerning the volume of the mesh cells was realized considering it unnecessary to expect that it is much easier to open microcracks once they are formed than to strain the solid further. Once the spall strength was reached, the damage in the new conceptual spall model would be only determined by a series of closed equations including the stress relaxation relationship given by the strength function, the energy conservation equation, the equation of state, and the constitutive equations for the damaged aggregate. The new conceptual spall model contains only two parameters: the spall strength and the critical damage, the determination of which should make the computed results of spall tests under the appropriate initial and boundary conditions consistent with the experimental free surface velocity profile of target or the stress profile of interface between target and low impedance buffer and the observed damage at spall plane for spall tests. It is worth to note that choosing a strength function or a stress relaxation equation provides a possibility of determining the damage and excludes any extra equation of damage evalution.
-
Key words:
- spall model /
- spall strength /
- strength function /
- critical damage
-
Curran D R, Seaman L, Shockey D A. Dynamic Failure of Solids [J]. Phys Rep Rev Sec Phys Lett, 1987, 147(5-6): 253. Johnson J N, Addessio F L. Tensile Plasticity and Ductile Fracture [J]. J Appl Phys, 1988, 64(2): 6699-6712. Rajendran A M, Dietenberger M A, Grove D J. A Void Growth-Based Failure Model to Describe Spallation [J]. J Appl Phys, 1989, 65: 1521. Addessio F L, Johnson J N. A Constitutive Model for The Dynamic Response of Brittle Materials [J]. J Appl Phys, 1990, 67: 3275. Nemes J A, Eftis J, Randles P W. Viscoplastic Constitute Modeling of High Strain Rate Deformation, Material Damage and Spall Fracture [J]. J Appl Mechan, 1990, 57(2): 282-291. Eftis J, Nemes J A. Modeling of Impact-Induced Spall Fracture and Post Spall Behavior of a Circular Plate [J]. Int J Fract Mech, 1992, 53(4): 301-324. Cortes R. Dynamic Growth of Microvoids under Combined Hydrostatic and Deviatoric Stresses [J]. Int J Solids Struct, 1992, 29(13): 1637-1645. Addessio F L, Johnson J N. Rate-Dependent Ductile Failure Model [J]. J Appl Phys, 1993, 74(3): 1640-1648. Nemes J A, Eftis J, Randles P W. Viscoplastic Constitutive Modeling of High Strain-Rate Deformation, Material Damage and Spall Fracture [J]. J Appl Mech, 1990, 57: 282. Thomason P F. Ductile Spallation Fracture and the Mechanics of Void Growth and Coalescence under Shock-Loading Conditions [J]. Acta Mater, 1999, 47: 3633-3646. Tonks D L, Zurek A K, Thissell W R. Void Coalescence Model for Ductile Damage [A]. Furnish M D, Thadhani N N, Horie Y. Shock Compression of Condensed Matter-2001 [C]. New York: American Institute of Physics, 2002. 611-614. Grady D E, Kipp M E. Dynamic Fracture and Fragmentation [A]. Asay J R, Shahinpoor M. High-Pressure Shock Compression of Solids [C]. New York: Springer-Verlag Inc, 1993. 267. Cochran S, Banner D. Spall Studies in Uranium [J]. J Appl Phys, 1977, 48: 2729. Wilkins M L. Calculation of Elastic-Plastic Flow [A]. Alder B. Methods in Computational Physics(3) [C]. New York: Academic Press, 1964. 211-263. Steinberg D J, Cochran S G, Guinan M W. A Constitutive Model for Metals Applicable at High-Strain Rate [J]. J Appl Phys, 1980, 51: 1498-1504. Rajendran A M. High Strain Rate Behavior of Metals [R]. AD-A252979, 1992. Chen D N, Al-Hassani S T S, Sarumi M, et al. Crack Straining-Based Spall Model [J]. Int J Impact Eng, 1997, 19: 107-116. Morris C E. Los Alamos Shock Wave Profile Data [C]. California: University of California Press, 1982. 70. Chen D N, Yu Y Y, Yin Z H, et al. On the Validity of the Traditional Measurement of Spall Strength [J]. Int J Impact Eng, 2005, 31: 811-824.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 7403
- HTML全文浏览量: 339
- PDF下载量: 877