Volume 33 Issue 4
Jul 2019
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
PAN Xin, WANG Hao, WU Haijun, PI Aiguo, LI Jinzhu. Numerical Simulation of Thin Steel Target Perforated by Conical-Nosed Projectile with Yaw Angle[J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2019, 33(4): 045106. doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.20180691
Citation: PAN Xin, WANG Hao, WU Haijun, PI Aiguo, LI Jinzhu. Numerical Simulation of Thin Steel Target Perforated by Conical-Nosed Projectile with Yaw Angle[J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2019, 33(4): 045106. doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.20180691

Numerical Simulation of Thin Steel Target Perforated by Conical-Nosed Projectile with Yaw Angle

doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.20180691
  • Received Date: 18 Nov 2018
  • Rev Recd Date: 08 Jan 2019
  • Numerical simulations are conducted for perforation of conical projectile impacting on thin steel target with various yaw angles to investigate the influence of yaw angle. The finite element models of conical projectile impacting on thin steel target with yaw angle varying from 2° to 10° are established with the non-linear finite element code ANSYS/LS-DYNA. After the reliability of numerical simulations is verified, numerical simulations of conical projectile impacting on thin steel target with different yaw angles and initial velocities are carried out. A four-step model to analyze the process of projectile’s deflection is addressed by comparing the process of target’s failure and projectile’s deflection. At last, we discuss the projectile’s trajectory angel deflection and angular velocity through the validated numerical analysis. The results show that the failure of asymmetric petalling occurs when a thin plate is impacted by conical-nosed projectile with yaw angle. With the increase of the yaw angle and the decrease of initial velocity, the deflection of the trajectory will be more obvious; the deflection change of projectile relates to the initial velocity; the deflection angle shows a trend of increasing first and subsequently decreasing when the initial impact velocity is relatively high (greater than about 1.4 times the ballistic limit). When the projectile moves out of target, the angular velocity rises with the increase of the yaw angle, but it increases reversely and then reduces with the increase of initial velocity.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    BACKMAN M E, GOLDSMITH W. The mechanics of penetration of projectiles into targets [J]. International Journal of Engineering Science, 1978, 16(1): 1–99. doi: 10.1016/0020-7225(78)90002-2
    [2]
    CORBETT G G, REID S R, JOHNSON W. Impact loading of plates and shells by free-flying projectiles: a review [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 1996, 18(2): 141–230. doi: 10.1016/0734-743X(95)00023-4
    [3]
    ZUKAS J A. Impact dynamics [M].New York:Wiley,1982.
    [4]
    ANDERSON C E JR, BODNER S R. Ballistic impact: the status of analytical and numerical modeling [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 1988, 7(1): 9–35. doi: 10.1016/0734-743X(88)90010-3
    [5]
    钱伟长. 穿甲力学 [M]. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 1984.

    QIAN W C. Mechanics of perforation [M]. Beijing: National Defense Industry Press, 1984.
    [6]
    GOLDSMITH W. Non-ideal projectile impact on targets [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 1999, 22(2/3): 95–395.
    [7]
    DENG Y F, LI J F, JIA B H, et al. Numerical study of failure modes and crack propagation in 2A12 aluminum target against blunt-nosed projectile at low yaw angle [J]. Strength of Materials, 2016, 48(6): 834–849. doi: 10.1007/s11223-017-9830-3
    [8]
    徐双喜, 吴卫国, 李晓彬, 等. 锥头弹小斜角侵彻薄板剩余速度理论分析 [J]. 弹道学报, 2010, 22(3): 58–62.

    XU S X, WU W G, LI X B, et al. Theoretical analysis on residual velocity of conical projectile after penetrating thin plate at low oblique angle [J]. Journal of Ballistics, 2010, 22(3): 58–62.
    [9]
    熊飞, 石全, 张成, 等. 不同头部形状半穿甲战斗部侵彻薄钢板数值模拟 [J]. 弹箭与制导学报, 2015(1): 55–58.

    XIONG F, SHI Q, ZHANG C, et al. Numerical simulation on the semi-armor-piercing warhead with different nose shapes penetrating thin steel target [J]. Journal of Projectiles, Rockets, Missile and Guidance, 2015(1): 55–58.
    [10]
    董三强, 蔡星会, 王国亮, 等. 攻角对半穿甲战斗部侵彻航母双层靶板的效应研究 [J]. 舰船科学技术, 2017(21): 37–41.

    DONG S Q, CAI X H, WANG G L, et al. Numerical simulation research on effect of warhead penetrating double-layer aircraft carrier targets [J]. Ship Science and Technology, 2017(21): 37–41.
    [11]
    侯旷怡, 李可达, 张新伟. 着靶姿态对半穿甲战斗部穿甲过程的影响 [J]. 兵器装备工程学报, 2017(4): 65–68.

    HOU K Y, LI K D, ZHANG X W. Influence of hitting attitude in armor-piercing process [J]. Journal of Ordnance Equipment Engineering, 2017(4): 65–68.
    [12]
    邓云飞, 袁家俊. 攻角对卵形头弹撞击铝合金薄板影响的数值研究 [J]. 高压物理学报, 2018, 32(4): 045102. doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.20170601

    DENG Y F, YUAN J J. Numerical research of influence of attack angle on thin aluminum alloy plate impacted by ogival-nosed projectile [J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2018, 32(4): 045102. doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.20170601
    [13]
    KPENYIGBA K M, JANKOWIAK T, RUSINEK A, et al. Influence of projectile shape on dynamic behavior of steel sheet subjected to impact and perforation [J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2013, 65: 93–104. doi: 10.1016/j.tws.2013.01.003
    [14]
    RECHT R F, IPSON T W. Ballistic perforation dynamics [J]. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 1963, 30(3): 384. doi: 10.1115/1.3636566
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(17)  / Tables(3)

    Article Metrics

    Article views(5516) PDF downloads(27) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return