Anti-Explosion Performance of Different Anti-Explosion Structures under Gas Explosion in Pipe Gallery

LIU Xiliang; LI Ye; WANG Xinyu; GURKALO Filip

doi:10.11858/gywlxb.20180640

Volume 33 Issue 4

Jul 2019

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics > 2019 > 33(4): 045204.

LIU Xiliang, LI Ye, WANG Xinyu, GURKALO Filip. Anti-Explosion Performance of Different Anti-Explosion Structures under Gas Explosion in Pipe Gallery[J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2019, 33(4): 045204. doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.20180640

Citation:

LIU Xiliang, LI Ye, WANG Xinyu, GURKALO Filip. Anti-Explosion Performance of Different Anti-Explosion Structures under Gas Explosion in Pipe Gallery[J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2019, 33(4): 045204. doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.20180640

Citation:

PDF( 12091 KB)

Anti-Explosion Performance of Different Anti-Explosion Structures under Gas Explosion in Pipe Gallery

doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.20180640

LIU Xiliang^{1, 2, 3
,},
LI Ye^{1,*
,
,},
WANG Xinyu^{1, 2, 3},
GURKALO Filip¹

1.
School of Civil Engineering, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo 454000, China
2.
Henan Key Laboratory of Underground Engineering and Disaster Prevention, Jiaozuo 454000, China
3.
International Joint Research Laboratory of Henan Province for Underground Space Development and Disaster Prevention, Jiaozuo 454000, China

Received Date: 19 Sep 2018
Rev Recd Date: 07 Jan 2019

Abstract

Abstract

The project of loop pipeline in Pingtan test area is used as the engineering background. To compare the anti-explosion performance of " foam aluminum” and " steel plate-foamed aluminum-steel plate” anti-explosion structure under gas explosion, a 3D pipe gallery and soil structure is studied and analyzed by ANSYS/LS-DYNA. The results show that: the structure closest to the explosion gas on the internal wall is broken down at first followed by the damaging of the joint structure of interior and exterior wall in the gas cabin. The stress in the aluminum foam sandwich structure attenuates most quickly. Measuring point peak stress can be reduced as much as 67.35% by aluminum foam sandwich structure compared with no explosion-proof structure. Measuring point peak stress is reduced by 43.99% by aluminum foam structure. The kinetic energy peak value of gallery without anti-explosion is 0.11 kJ. The kinetic energy peak value of gallery with aluminum foam sandwich is 0.021 kJ. By comparison to the gallery without any explosion-proof structure, the kinetic energy is reduced by 80.9%. A comprehensive suggestion is that, laying aluminum foam and aluminum foam core material can reduce the damage of the corridor structure, and the aluminum foam sandwich structure behaves the best.
- underground engineering,
- anti-explosion performance,
- numerical simulation,
- pipe gallery,
- energy absorbing material

FullText(HTML)

References(21)

References

[1]	雷升祥. 综合管廊与管道盾构 [M]. 北京: 中国铁道出版社, 2016. LEI S X. Utility tunnel and pipeline shield [M]. Beijing: China Railyway Press, 2016.
[2]	钱七虎, 陈晓强. 国内外地下综合管线廊道发展的现状、问题及对策 [J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2007, 3(2): 191–194. QIAN Q H, CHEN X Q. Situation problems and countermeasures of utility tunnel development in China and abroad [J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2007, 3(2): 191–194.
[3]	WILLIAMSON E B, BAYRAK O, DAVIS C, et al. Performance of bridge columns subjected to blast loads Ⅰ: experimental program [J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2011, 16(6): 693–702. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000220
[4]	OLMATI P, PETRINI F, GKOUMAS K. Fragility analysis for the performance-based design of cladding wall panels subjected to blast load [J]. Engineering Structures, 2014, 78: 112–120. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.06.004
[5]	丁阳, 方磊, 李忠献, 等. 防恐建筑结构抗爆防护分类设防标准研究 [J]. 建筑结构学报, 2013, 34(4): 57–64. DING Y, FANG L, LI Z X, et al. Research on categorized explosion protection criterion of anti-terrorism building structures [J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2013, 34(4): 57–64.
[6]	闫秋实, 刘晶波, 伍俊. 典型地铁车站内爆炸致人员伤亡区域的预测研究 [J]. 工程力学, 2012, 29(2): 81–88. YAN Q S, LIU J B, WU J. Estimation of casually areas in subway station subjected to terrorist bomb [J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2012, 29(2): 81–88.
[7]	于润清, 方秦, 陈力, 等. 建筑结构构件基于性能的抗爆设计方法 [J]. 工程力学, 2016, 33(11): 75–83. doi: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2015.04.0280 YU R Q, FANG Q, CHEN L, et al. Performance-based blast-resistant design of building structure components [J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2016, 33(11): 75–83. doi: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2015.04.0280
[8]	宋彬, 黄正祥, 翟文, 等. 聚脲弹性体夹芯防爆罐抗爆性能研究 [J]. 振动与冲击, 2016, 35(7): 138–144. SONG B, HAUNG Z X, ZHAI W, et al. Anti-detonation properties of explosion-proof pots made of sandwich structure with polyurea elastomer [J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2016, 35(7): 138–144.
[9]	任新见, 李广新, 张胜民. 泡沫铝夹心排爆罐抗爆性能试验研究 [J]. 振动与冲击, 2011, 30(5): 213–217. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3835.2011.05.044 REN X J, LI G X, ZHANG S M. Antidetonation property tests for explosion-proof pots made of sandwich structure with aluminum foam [J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2011, 30(5): 213–217. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3835.2011.05.044
[10]	TEKALUR S A, SHUKLA A, SHIVAKUMAR K. Blast resistance of polyurea based layered composite materials [J]. Composite Structures, 2008, 84(3): 271–281. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2007.08.008
[11]	张秀华. 气体爆炸冲击作用下钢框架康保性能试验研究与数值模拟 [D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学, 2011. ZHANG X H. Experimental research and numerical simulation on blast resistance performance of steel frames [D]. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology, 2011.
[12]	李忠献, 刘杨, 田力. 单侧隧道内爆炸荷载作用下双线地铁隧道的动力响应与抗爆分析 [J]. 北京工业大学学报, 2006, 32(2): 173–181. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0254-0037.2006.02.014 LI Z X, LIU Y, TIAN L. Dynamic response and blast-resistance analysis of double track subway tunnel subkected to blast loading within one side of tunnel [J]. Journal of Beijing University of Technology, 2006, 32(2): 173–181. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0254-0037.2006.02.014
[13]	刘颖芳, 刘仁辉, 石少卿, 等. 应用泡沫铝降低地下爆炸冲击波的数值分析 [J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2008, 4(2): 230–233. LIU Y F, LIU R H, SHI S Q, et al. Numerical simulation analysis of reducing blast by using foam aluminum [J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2008, 4(2): 230–233.
[14]	GOEL M D, MATSAGAR V A, GUPTA A K. Blast resistance of stiffened sandwich panels with closed-cell aluminum foam [J]. Latin American Journal of Solids and Structures, 2014, 11(13): 2497–2515. doi: 10.1590/S1679-78252014001300010
[15]	夏志成, 王曦浩, 赵跃堂, 等. 钢板夹泡沫铝组合板抗接性能研究 [J]. 振动与冲击, 2017, 36(2): 117–122. XIA Z C, WANG X H, ZHAO Y T, et al. Anti-blast performance of aluminum foam-core sandwich panels [J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2017, 36(2): 117–122.
[16]	DHARMASENA K P, WADLEY H N G, XUE Z Y, et al. Mechanical response of metallic honeycomb sandwich panel structures to high-intensity dynamic loading [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2008, 35(9): 1063–1074. doi: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2007.06.008
[17]	张旭红, 王志华, 赵隆茂. 爆炸荷载下铝蜂窝夹芯板动力响应研究 [J]. 应用力学学报, 2009, 26(2): 2459–2463. ZHANG X H, WANG Z H, ZHAO L M. Dynamic plastic response of sandwich plate with aluminum honeycombs core under blast loading [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Mechanics, 2009, 26(2): 2459–2463.
[18]	杨德庆, 马涛, 张梗林. 舰艇新型宏观负泊松比效应蜂窝舷侧防护结构 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2015, 35(2): 243–248. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2015)02-0243-06 YANG D Q, MA T, ZHANG G L. A novel auxetic broadside defensive structure for naval ships [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2015, 35(2): 243–248. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2015)02-0243-06
[19]	Livermore Software Technology Corporation. LS-DYNA keyword user’s manual [Z]. Livermore, CA: Livermore Software Technology Corporation, 2006.
[20]	赵衡阳. 气体和粉尘爆炸原理 [M]. 北京: 北京理工大学出版社, 1996. ZHAO H Y. The principle of gas and dust explosion [M]. Beijing: Beijing Institute of Technology Press, 1996.
[21]	吴燕燕. 室内燃气爆炸作用下钢框架结构动力响应与连续倒塌分析 [D]. 哈尔滨: 东北林业大学, 2012. WU Y Y. Analysis on dynamic responses and progressive collapse of steel frame structure subject ti internal gas explosion [D]. Harbin: Northeast Forestry University, 2012.

Relative Articles

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Proportional views

Proportional views

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Figures(11) / Tables(3)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article Metrics

Article views(6698) PDF downloads(20)

Anti-Explosion Performance of Different Anti-Explosion Structures under Gas Explosion in Pipe Gallery

doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.20180640

Abstract

References

Proportional views

Catalog

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Article Metrics

Proportional views

Related

Anti-Explosion Performance of Different Anti-Explosion Structures under Gas Explosion in Pipe Gallery

doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.20180640

Abstract

References

Proportional views

Catalog

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Article Metrics

Proportional views

Related

Export File

Citation

Format

Content