水下爆炸载荷作用下水下目标结构的可靠性研究

李万 张志华 李华 李大伟

李万, 张志华, 李华, 李大伟. 水下爆炸载荷作用下水下目标结构的可靠性研究[J]. 高压物理学报, 2014, 28(3): 324-330. doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.2014.03.010
引用本文: 李万, 张志华, 李华, 李大伟. 水下爆炸载荷作用下水下目标结构的可靠性研究[J]. 高压物理学报, 2014, 28(3): 324-330. doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.2014.03.010
LI Wan, ZHANG Zhi-Hua, LI Hua, LI Da-Wei. Reliability on Underwater Target Structure Subjected to Underwater Explosion[J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2014, 28(3): 324-330. doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.2014.03.010
Citation: LI Wan, ZHANG Zhi-Hua, LI Hua, LI Da-Wei. Reliability on Underwater Target Structure Subjected to Underwater Explosion[J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2014, 28(3): 324-330. doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.2014.03.010

水下爆炸载荷作用下水下目标结构的可靠性研究

doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.2014.03.010
基金项目: 国家自然科学基金(50775218);海军工程大学博士生创新基金(HGBSJJ2011009)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    李万(1986—),男,博士研究生,主要从事武器系统总体技术、高维数据处理、水下爆炸等研究.E-mail:liwan3525083@163.com

  • 中图分类号: O383.1

Reliability on Underwater Target Structure Subjected to Underwater Explosion

  • 摘要: 为研究水下爆炸载荷作用下某水下目标结构的可靠性,通过开展多组试验获得了真实可靠的样本数据,进而分别利用多项式逐步回归和神经网络对样本数据进行拟合分析,获得结构响应变量和输入变量之间的近似解析表达式。然后利用蒙特卡洛模拟法得到结构响应的统计参数和分布函数,并对结构进行可靠性分析和计算,最后得到了爆炸点在平面内变化时结构的失效概率曲线,为工程结构的防护提供了参考。

     

  • 图  3层BP网络结构

    Figure  1.  Structure of BP network with three layers

    图  网络训练结果

    Figure  2.  Network training results

    图  毁伤等效值分布直方图

    Figure  3.  Damage distribution histogram of damage equivalent value

    图  毁伤等效值的正态性检验

    Figure  4.  Normality test of damage equivalent value

    图  基于多项式逐步回归模型的失效概率

    Figure  5.  Failure probability based on stepwise polynomial regression model

    图  基于BP神经网络模型的失效概率

    Figure  6.  Failure probability based on BP neural network model

    表  1  不同方向角和爆炸距离的结构毁伤效果

    Table  1.   Damage results of the target at different direction angles and explosion distances

    Experiment
    No.
    α R/(m) M Discrimination result
    by M
    Experimental
    result
    1 π/4 3.70 6.312 0
    2 π/4 2.70 -3.803 6
    3 π/4 3.20 3.652 5
    4 π/4 2.55 0.659 4
    5 0 2.70 -4.112 9
    6 3π/4 2.70 1.946 8
    7 π/2 2.70 0.244 0
    8 3π/4 2.40 -6.903 1
    9 3π/4 2.20 -5.045 9
    10 3π/4 2.20 2.634 0
    11 π/2 2.20 -3.932 6
    12 π/4 3.20 1.170 3
    13 π/4 2.90 -1.238 4
    14 π/4 3.05 2.614 0
    15 0 2.90 2.866 4 * *
    16 3π/4 2.90 4.361 8
    17 π/2 2.90 3.529 8
    18 π/2 2.70 4.482 3
    19 3π/4 2.40 -0.816 8
    Note: The data with * show that discrimination results are different from experimental results; The data with ﹟ are verification data.
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  两种模型的预测结果分析

    Table  2.   Prediction results analysis for two kinds of model

    Verification
    Exp.No.
    Verification
    value
    Polynomial regression BP neural network
    Predictive value Relative error/(%) Predictive value Relative error/(%)
    3 3.652 5 3.566 7 2.35 3.589 1 1.74
    8 -6.903 1 -4.675 1 32.28 -5.986 3 13.28
    13 -1.238 4 -0.935 5 24.46 -1.268 7 2.45
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] Rama K, Vendhn C P. Deformation and rupture of thin rectangular plates subjected to underwater shock[J]. Impact Eng, 2004, 30(6): 699-719. doi: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2003.01.001
    [2] Disciuva M, Lomario D. A comparison between Monte Carlo and FORMS in calculating the reliability of a composite structure[J]. Compos Struct, 2003, 59(1): 155-162. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263822302001708
    [3] 施兴华, 张婧, 王善.水下接触爆炸载荷作用下多层板壳破坏概率分析[J].弹道学报, 2009, 21(1): 1-4. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-DDXB200901002.htm

    Shi X H, Zhang J, Wang S. Destroy probability of multilayer plate-shell structure subjected to underwater contact explosions[J]. Journal of Ballistics, 2009, 21(1): 1-4. (in Chinese) http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-DDXB200901002.htm
    [4] Kiyohiro I, Dan M F. Geometrically nonlinear finite element reliability analysis of structural systems Ⅰ: Theory[J]. Comput Struct, 2000, 77(6): 677-691. doi: 10.1016/S0045-7949(00)00010-9
    [5] Kwon Y W. Comparison of USA-DYNA finite element models for a stiffen shell subjected to underwater shock[J]. Comput Struct, 1998, 66(1): 127-144. doi: 10.1016/S0045-7949(97)00049-7
    [6] 张志华, 钟强晖, 李庆民.小药量水下爆炸对水下目标的毁伤有效值评估[J].兵工学报, 2009, 30(10): 1344-1348. http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/bgxb200910012

    Zhang Z H, Zhong Q H, Li Q M. Evaluation of damage valid value of underwater target detonated by small charge[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2009, 30(10): 1344-1348. (in Chinese) http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/bgxb200910012
    [7] 高惠璇.应用多元统计分析[M].北京: 北京大学出版社, 2005: 1-100.

    Gao H X. Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis[M]. Beijing: Peking University Press, 2005: 1-100. (in Chinese)
    [8] 段宝福, 张猛, 李俊猛.逐孔起爆震动参数预报的BP神经网络模型[J].爆炸与冲击, 2010, 30(4): 401-406. http://www.cqvip.com/QK/94778X/20104/35289491.html

    Duan B F, Zhang M, Li J M. A BP neural network model for forecasting of vibration parameters from hole-by-hole detonation[J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2010, 30(4): 401-406. (in Chinese) http://www.cqvip.com/QK/94778X/20104/35289491.html
  • 加载中
图(6) / 表(2)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  6357
  • HTML全文浏览量:  2081
  • PDF下载量:  323
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2012-05-21
  • 修回日期:  2012-08-23

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回